I’m a Presbyterian. I’m an old fashioned Presbyterian. I’m a hard-core, old-fashioned Presbyterian. That is to say, I take the historic, Protestant position that “holy days” such as “Christmas” are an innovation of the Roman Catholic Church and have no Scriptural warrant. Furthermore, I also take the position that the “Christmas tree” is a Christianized tradition of ancient pagan tree worship. In short, I’m no apologist for the Christmas holiday or its traditions, especially the Christmas tree.

I say all this not to promote my personal view on these matters but rather to provide a context for what I’m about to do, which is to rigorously defend the use of the phrase “Christmas tree” in the public arena.

Recently at a public school in Ames, IA, there were complaints about a Christmas tree at the school. The tree was apparently “offensive” to some, and school officials decided it had to go. This was rather silly for any number of reasons, but that’s not what struck me as preposterous. What did strike me as preposterous was the subsequent news media coverage in which at least two media outlets didn’t call it a Christmas tree. One called it a “winter tree”, and another called it a “decorated pine tree”. It’s possible, of course, that the school itself was using those terms when describing the tree in interviews with the media, but that wouldn’t necessitate the exclusive use of those terms. The media simply could have referred to it as something “commonly called a Christmas tree”. How hard would that have been?

The notion that anything remotely religious (particularly if it’s Christian) has to be eliminated from public life is utterly ridiculous and a pathetic misunderstanding of the Constitution. But it’s the politically correct thing to do, and the saps in the media are quite happy to further this myth instead of merely reporting the news.

Theologically speaking I may not be happy about it, but it’s been a Christmas tree in Western Civilization for at least some four centuries. Don’t insult my intelligence by calling it something else in some stupid (and for most of us, offensive) attempt to remove the name of Christ from the public arena.

You May Also Like

The New Yorker Article With Kavanaugh’s Second Accuser Is a Train Wreck

Shane Vander Hart: The New Yorker’s hit piece on Brett Kavanaugh written by Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer is a shoddy, poorly sourced piece by any journalistic standard.

12 Russian Intelligence Officers Indicted in DCCC, DNC, and Clinton Campaign Hack

A grand jury convened as part of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation returned an indictment against 12 Russian intelligence officers for their interference in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.

Joni Ernst Discusses Trump’s Cabinet, the United Nations and Life

U.S. Senator Joni Ernst discussed Trump’s cabinet picks, United Nations funding after anti-Israel vote and whether there will be progress on the life issue.

Grassley and McConnell’s Only Job To Do With Obama’s SCOTUS Pick

Robert Romano: U.S Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell have one job to do on Obama’s SCOTUS nominee – nothing.