I wanted to address a couple of comments I have received after my post in support of Iowa House File 5 which would effectively ban abortions after 20 weeks with the exception of a specific threat to the life of the mother or the loss of a major bodily function.

One commenter pointed out the failure of the partial birth abortion ban, saying no babies were saved.  First, how exactly can one say that?  How can you quantify that specifically?  I agree that banning one technique is extremely limited, but you really canā€™t equate that with this ban.

Another commenter basically questioned my pro-life bona fides when he said, ā€œYou canā€™t claim to be pro-life if (sic) support legislation that violates the core tenent (sic) that all pre-born babies possess an inalienable right to lifeā€¦ As Christians we don’t have the right to say it’s ok to kill certain types of babies.ā€

This gentleman also wanted to call National Right to Life and Priests for Life ā€œfakeā€ prolife organizations.  Really?  Iā€™m sorry that is completely arrogant.  Letā€™s not confuse strategy from principles.

I reject the premise of his argument.  Iā€™m not saying it is ok to kill certain types of babies.  Iā€™m trying to restrict what I can.  It is already legal to have an abortion.  This bill makes it harder.  If I didnā€™t want to go further than this then I guess this guyā€™s criticism would be valid, but I donā€™t.

If you apply this argument to other issues ā€“ back before the Civil War, youā€™d say legislation that would keep new states from being slave states isnā€™t ok, because it doesnā€™t ban slavery outright.  Is that a reasonable position to have?  Is it not ok to keep slavery from being expanded while you work toward an outright ban?

How would this gentleman like me to turn this around on him.  By not supporting this ban you are saying it is ok for late-term babies to be killed if you canā€™t get a personhood bill passed.  As a Christian we donā€™t have the right to say itā€™s ok to kill certain types of babies right?  Well evidently he is ok with late-term babies to be aborted.  Besides if this is such a prochoice bill Planned Parenthood and pro-abortion Democrats should be in support right?

Just to note, I donā€™t believe that, and Iā€™m not going to attack the character and principles of fellow prolifers who disagree with me.  It is a strategy, period.  Which brings me to the next commenter who alludes that I donā€™t support the Personhood amendment ā€“ HJR 3 .  He said I need to promote it.  In my defense, this was just introduced the afternoon before I wrote my previous post and wasnā€™t online yet.  So I didnā€™t know about it.

Let me be clear, I want a personhood amendment passed, and any other prolife legislation passed.  I have never said otherwise.  If Republican leadership fudges on these I will not hesitate to call them out either.

You May Also Like

Iowa Secretary of State Contacting Eligible Iowans Not Registered to Vote

Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate is reaching out to more than 300,000 Iowans who are eligible to vote but are not registered.

Liberty Alive and Well in Iowa

This last weekend Young Americans for Liberty had their state convention in…

Iowa Statewide Trifecta, Vote for Dave Jamison, Matt Schultz and Brenna Findley

I wanted to encourage you to vote for a couple of candidates…

Schultz Rolls Out Radio and TV Ads in Iowa Secretary of State Race

From the Matt Schultz for Iowa Secretary of State Campaign: Council Bluffs,…