Iowa State CapitolThe Iowa House passes HJR 6 by a vote of 62-37, this resolution introduces an amendment to the Iowa Constitution defining marriage to be between one man and one woman.

The entire Republican caucus voted in favor of the resolution minus State Representative Betty DeBoef (R-What Cheer) who was ill today.  Three Democrats joined with Republicans to vote yes – State Representatives Dan Muhlbauer (D-Manilla), Brian Quirk (D–New Hampton), and Kurt Swaim (D-Bloomfield).

Before Iowans can vote on the language in this amendment it first needs to pass the Iowa Senate.  Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal (D-Council Bluffs) has already promised to block a vote, and an attempted vote to bypass Senate rules to allow the Senate version to come to the floor to be debated and voted on failed.  The amendment would have to be passed again in the next General Assembly before it could be placed on the ballot.

16 comments
  1. I call upon all Democrats. Buy a digital camera, and keep it with you at all times, photograph your hypocrite Republican friends/enemies doing things that proves how hypocritical they are.

  2. And what happens to existing same-sex marriages should this pass. With language the precludes any kind of recognition of same-sex relationships, what does this mean to the families … yes, the children … of same-sex couples?

    1. What a mess the Iowa Supreme Court and a spineless Democratically controlled Iowa Legislature made.

      The Legislature should have acted to either amend the constitution or to codify SSM.

      What will happen to the children? Probably nothing there was already guidelines for gay adoptions on the books beforehand.

  3. Rep. Rich Anderson, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said this is meant to foster “responsible procreation,” according to the Des Moines Register. And how many out-of-wedlock births will this prevent? It will probably increase out-of-wedlock births. Gay people will still be having children, but now they won’t be able to marry their partners. While I admit some unease in creating children through artificial means, that genie is not going back in the bottle.

  4. I don’t have any more info.

    Typically I would say yes that it is better for opposite sex parents to marry, especially if they are cohabitating. There are circumstances where it wouldn’t be a good idea though.

    Regarding same sex couples – you don’t have two biological parents here, so no I don’t think it matters and I don’t think it a healthy example for kids regardless.

  5. Shane–

    Tying up a few issues–

    The only mess is being caused by those who voted to take away the freedom to marry regardless of sex.

    Polygamy is a separate issue that was not addressed in Varnum. If you’re saying it’s a slippery slope, when did the slope start? With same-sex marriage? With the courts striking down anti-miscegenation laws? With women becoming legally equal to men in marriage? With the introduction of the legal marriage itself (if you let men and women marry, the next thing you know men will be marrying cats!)?

    I’m still trying to figure out what good will come of this. I’m still trying to figure out how this will benefit Iowa’s families.

  6. Shane–

    Tying up a few issues–

    The only mess is being caused by those who voted to take away the freedom to marry regardless of sex.

    Polygamy is a separate issue that was not addressed in Varnum. If you’re saying it’s a slippery slope, when did the slope start? With same-sex marriage? With the courts striking down anti-miscegenation laws? With women becoming legally equal to men in marriage? With the introduction of the legal marriage itself (if you let men and women marry, the next thing you know men will be marrying cats!)?

    I’m still trying to figure out what good will come of this. I’m still trying to figure out how this will benefit Iowa’s families.

  7. How did the Democratically-controlled Iowa Legislature make a mess? Didn’t the Republicans hold majorities during the 77th General Assembly?

      1. I don’t know that I’d agree that it was the mess, either. However, the current mess is, at least indirectly, a result of the passage of DOMA

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

Iowa Bill Defunding Abortion Providers Advances to Full Senate

The Iowa Senate Judiciary Committee voted 8 to 5 in favor of sending SF 2, a bill reallocating taxpayer money from abortion providers, to the full Senate.

Greek Canary in the Coal Mine

By Jim Gibbons, Republican Candidate in Iowa’s 3rd Congressional District If you…

Can You Believe This?

Jenifer Bowen: Iowa went from one of the most extremely lenient states, allowing abortions through all nine months, to an “abortion desert” in a matter of months!

Scott Walker to Headline NW Iowa Republican Fundraiser

Governor Scott Walker (R-WI) will headline a multi county Northwest Iowa Republican fundraising event on Friday, April 24 at 7:30pm in Sheldon, IA.