<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Caffeinated Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://caffeinatedthoughts.com</link>
	<description>Stimulating musings on culture, current events and politics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Santorum on Satan by Eric P</title>
		<link>http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2012/02/santorum-on-satan/comment-page-1/#comment-30808</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/?p=17788#comment-30808</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s ironic how any Reformed believer would side with Santorum or others on their stance on faith when he subscribes to Catholic doctrine, Romney subscribes to Mormon doctrine, Gingrich subscribes to who knows what depending on the crowd he&#039;s talking to, Ron Paul subscribes to an Evangelical position, and Obama subscribes to Liberation Theology. OH WAIT.. did I say Ron Paul says he subscribes to a Evangelical Position? It&#039;s true, that&#039;s why Voddie Baucham endorses him: http://www.gracefamilybaptist.net/voddie-baucham-ministries/blog/why-ron-paul-2012-01/

So, if you&#039;re going to support a politician&#039;s understanding about Satan, you should first check out what his doctrinal view of Satan is first. Quite frankly, none of them probably line up with a Reformed view, but I would trust someone who claims to trust Jesus Christ as his personal Savior over someone who sees salvation as faith + works. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s ironic how any Reformed believer would side with Santorum or others on their stance on faith when he subscribes to Catholic doctrine, Romney subscribes to Mormon doctrine, Gingrich subscribes to who knows what depending on the crowd he&#8217;s talking to, Ron Paul subscribes to an Evangelical position, and Obama subscribes to Liberation Theology. OH WAIT.. did I say Ron Paul says he subscribes to a Evangelical Position? It&#8217;s true, that&#8217;s why Voddie Baucham endorses him: <a href="http://www.gracefamilybaptist.net/voddie-baucham-ministries/blog/why-ron-paul-2012-01/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gracefamilybaptist.net/voddie-baucham-ministries/blog/why-ron-paul-2012-01/</a></p>
<p>So, if you&#8217;re going to support a politician&#8217;s understanding about Satan, you should first check out what his doctrinal view of Satan is first. Quite frankly, none of them probably line up with a Reformed view, but I would trust someone who claims to trust Jesus Christ as his personal Savior over someone who sees salvation as faith + works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Santorum on Satan by Kevin Subra</title>
		<link>http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2012/02/santorum-on-satan/comment-page-1/#comment-30807</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Subra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/?p=17788#comment-30807</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the anti-God establishment GOP against those who actually seek to express their faith and live by it (see http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/02/chris-christie-rick-santorums-satan-comments-are-relevant/ for the &quot;leave religion out of this&quot; Christie). I found nothing that I disagree with in Santorum&#039;s &quot;Satan&quot; comments (what I heard). He&#039;s being scorned, it appears, for simply expressing a belief in Satan, as if he were doing the same thing for the Easter Bunny. Doesn&#039;t even &quot;God bless America&quot; imply more than a simple token statement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the anti-God establishment GOP against those who actually seek to express their faith and live by it (see <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/02/chris-christie-rick-santorums-satan-comments-are-relevant/" rel="nofollow">http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/02/chris-christie-rick-santorums-satan-comments-are-relevant/</a> for the &#8220;leave religion out of this&#8221; Christie). I found nothing that I disagree with in Santorum&#8217;s &#8220;Satan&#8221; comments (what I heard). He&#8217;s being scorned, it appears, for simply expressing a belief in Satan, as if he were doing the same thing for the Easter Bunny. Doesn&#8217;t even &#8220;God bless America&#8221; imply more than a simple token statement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Classical Literature Is Just Too Time Consuming by SJ</title>
		<link>http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2012/02/classical-literature-is-just-too-time-consuming/comment-page-1/#comment-30806</link>
		<dc:creator>SJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/?p=17785#comment-30806</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Totally true, I didn&#039;t mean to imply that was the silver bullet.&lt;/i&gt;

Oh, certainly--you did have a good point.  After all. you do have to know what good English is before you can write it.  ;)

I also just remembered an interesting article written a year ago by a columnist named Jim Mullen titled &quot;Banning Might Be Better.&quot;  The whole article is good, but here is one of his best points:

&lt;i&gt;Making kids read books they are not mature enough to understand makes them hate reading for the rest of their lives.&lt;/i&gt;

I think the most important thing English teachers can do is give kids the joy of reading, which is not that easy to achieve IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Totally true, I didn&#8217;t mean to imply that was the silver bullet.</i></p>
<p>Oh, certainly&#8211;you did have a good point.  After all. you do have to know what good English is before you can write it.  ;)</p>
<p>I also just remembered an interesting article written a year ago by a columnist named Jim Mullen titled &#8220;Banning Might Be Better.&#8221;  The whole article is good, but here is one of his best points:</p>
<p><i>Making kids read books they are not mature enough to understand makes them hate reading for the rest of their lives.</i></p>
<p>I think the most important thing English teachers can do is give kids the joy of reading, which is not that easy to achieve IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Santorum on Satan by Shane Vander Hart</title>
		<link>http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2012/02/santorum-on-satan/comment-page-1/#comment-30805</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Vander Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/?p=17788#comment-30805</guid>
		<description>So disagreeing with somebody&#039;s worldview is an attack?

I don&#039;t mind the worldview discussion.  There is a fundamental difference between Obama&#039;s worldview and say Rick Santorum&#039;s.  It does impact policy. These decisions don&#039;t happen in a void.

So I don&#039;t think that&#039;s an unfair question to pose to any candidate.  I think Santorum after the flap over his contraceptives comments was able to point to his record to prove he wasn&#039;t going to try to ban contraceptives. 
Anyway, Obama invited the worldview questions with his contraceptives mandate.  I think a discussion on religious liberty is important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So disagreeing with somebody&#8217;s worldview is an attack?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind the worldview discussion.  There is a fundamental difference between Obama&#8217;s worldview and say Rick Santorum&#8217;s.  It does impact policy. These decisions don&#8217;t happen in a void.</p>
<p>So I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s an unfair question to pose to any candidate.  I think Santorum after the flap over his contraceptives comments was able to point to his record to prove he wasn&#8217;t going to try to ban contraceptives.<br />
Anyway, Obama invited the worldview questions with his contraceptives mandate.  I think a discussion on religious liberty is important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Classical Literature Is Just Too Time Consuming by Shane Vander Hart</title>
		<link>http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2012/02/classical-literature-is-just-too-time-consuming/comment-page-1/#comment-30803</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Vander Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/?p=17785#comment-30803</guid>
		<description>&quot;
To some degree. But what helps writing skills the most is probably practice, practice, practice--not watching MTV or playing video games for hours. ;)&quot;  Totally true, I didn&#039;t mean to imply that was the silver bullet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221;<br />
To some degree. But what helps writing skills the most is probably practice, practice, practice&#8211;not watching MTV or playing video games for hours. <img src='http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8221;  Totally true, I didn&#8217;t mean to imply that was the silver bullet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Santorum on Satan by Matt</title>
		<link>http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2012/02/santorum-on-satan/comment-page-1/#comment-30802</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/?p=17788#comment-30802</guid>
		<description>His attacks on Obama&#039;s faith repulse me.  It should all be out of bounds as far as I&#039;m concerned.  It doesn&#039;t matter!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His attacks on Obama&#8217;s faith repulse me.  It should all be out of bounds as far as I&#8217;m concerned.  It doesn&#8217;t matter!  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Classical Literature Is Just Too Time Consuming by SJ</title>
		<link>http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2012/02/classical-literature-is-just-too-time-consuming/comment-page-1/#comment-30801</link>
		<dc:creator>SJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/?p=17785#comment-30801</guid>
		<description>In regard to classical literature, I always loved it.  When I was in high school, it seemed as though many of my classmates liked modern literature better, but I was rather old-fashioned.  Having said that, though, I do believe that a lot of English teachers end up making students--especially boys--hate reading for life by forcing certain choices upon them.  I guess the way I see it, students &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt; have to read the classics, but should not have to read them exclusively.  As for informational texts/commentaries, those sound like a bunch of garbage.  :)  I&#039;d say just let the kids pick some modern literature, including even well-written science fiction, to satisfy some of their reading requirements instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regard to classical literature, I always loved it.  When I was in high school, it seemed as though many of my classmates liked modern literature better, but I was rather old-fashioned.  Having said that, though, I do believe that a lot of English teachers end up making students&#8211;especially boys&#8211;hate reading for life by forcing certain choices upon them.  I guess the way I see it, students <i>should</i> have to read the classics, but should not have to read them exclusively.  As for informational texts/commentaries, those sound like a bunch of garbage.  :)  I&#8217;d say just let the kids pick some modern literature, including even well-written science fiction, to satisfy some of their reading requirements instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Classical Literature Is Just Too Time Consuming by Gina</title>
		<link>http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2012/02/classical-literature-is-just-too-time-consuming/comment-page-1/#comment-30800</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/?p=17785#comment-30800</guid>
		<description>&quot;There is such an over emphasis on STEM
 (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) that we are seeing 
literacy standards get dumbed down.  Having worked with kids a good 
number of years I have seen a growing inability to write.&quot;  YES. Exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There is such an over emphasis on STEM<br />
 (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) that we are seeing<br />
literacy standards get dumbed down.  Having worked with kids a good<br />
number of years I have seen a growing inability to write.&#8221;  YES. Exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fuzzy Math in Media&#8217;s Delegate Counts. by Ron Paul on the Issues - Page 175&#032;&#045;&#032;ALIPAC</title>
		<link>http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2012/02/fuzzy-math-in-medias-delegate-counts/comment-page-1/#comment-30799</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Paul on the Issues - Page 175&#032;&#045;&#032;ALIPAC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/?p=17737#comment-30799</guid>
		<description>[...] Tue, 02/21/2012 - 08:26   Every media outlet seems to have a different delegate count. But almost invariably we&#039;re told Ron Paul is in last place and far behind the leader Mitt Romney.  But none of these [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tue, 02/21/2012 &#8211; 08:26   Every media outlet seems to have a different delegate count. But almost invariably we&#039;re told Ron Paul is in last place and far behind the leader Mitt Romney.  But none of these [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fuzzy Math in Media&#8217;s Delegate Counts. by Wie viele Delegierte hat Ron Paul wirklich? &#124; Die Bananenrepublik</title>
		<link>http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/2012/02/fuzzy-math-in-medias-delegate-counts/comment-page-1/#comment-30798</link>
		<dc:creator>Wie viele Delegierte hat Ron Paul wirklich? &#124; Die Bananenrepublik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://caffeinatedthoughts.com/?p=17737#comment-30798</guid>
		<description>[...] der bisher gesammelten Delegierten zu führen. Es wird jedoch stets angeführt, dass Ron Paul unvermeidlich weit hinter dem vermeintlichen Top-Kandidaten Mitt Romney [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] der bisher gesammelten Delegierten zu führen. Es wird jedoch stets angeführt, dass Ron Paul unvermeidlich weit hinter dem vermeintlichen Top-Kandidaten Mitt Romney [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 556/562 objects using disk: basic

Served from: caffeinatedthoughts.com @ 2012-02-22 11:48:44 -->
