Two divergent opinions on the U.S. Government’s “rescue plan” of our financial system.

First, former Governor Mike Huckabee on his blog on Tuesday said:

Frankly, I’m disappointed and disgusted with my own Republican party as I watch them attempt to strong-arm a bailout of some of America’s biggest corporations by asking the taxpayers to suck up the staggering results of the hubris, greed, and arrogance of those who sought to make a quick buck by throwing the dice. They lost, but want the rest of us to cover their bets so they won’t be effected in their lavish lifestyles as they figure out how to spend their tens of millions and in some cases, hundreds of millions in bonuses and compensation which was their reward for not only sinking their companies, but basically doing the same to the entire American economy.

It’s especially disconcerting to see the very people who pilloried me during the Presidential campaign for being a “populist” and not “understanding Wall Street” to now line up like thirsty dogs at the Washington, D. C. water dish, otherwise known as Congress, and plead for help. I thought these guys were the smartest people in America! I thought that taxpayers like you and I were similar to the people at the U. N. who have no translator speaking into their headset – that we just needed to trust those that I called the power bunch in the “Wall Street to Washington axis of power.”

The idea of a government bailout in which we’d entrust $700 billion to one man without Congressional oversight or accountability is absurd. My party or not, that is insanity and I believe unconstitutional.

Chuck Colson in today’s Breakpoint commentary said:

Call it sticker shock. Across America, folks are outraged at the government’s rescue plan for the nation’s financial system. I understand—$700 billion is a lot of money.

But let’s get some perspective. Some estimate that the United States will spend more than $400 billion this year alone on foreign oil. So $700 billion is less than what we will be spending on foreign oil this year and next, putting money in the pockets of the likes of Saudi Arabia (which is an exporter of extremist Wahhabi Islam) and Venezuela (whose volatile leader, Hugo Chavez, makes no bones about hating the United States).

Talk about a transfer of wealth—it’s a bailout! Given the vast stores of oil off our shores and up north in Alaska, we don’t have to be pouring that much money overseas for oil. Finally, Congress has yielded to the will of the American public and has let the ban on offshore drilling expire. Good. Let’s start drilling and begin to make a dent in the $400 billion we send overseas each year.

That’s $400 billion that goes up in smoke, but in the rescue plan it is $700 billion actually invested in assets. That’s not a bailout. The government will be purchasing troubled mortgage-based assets at depressed prices. These are assets that are now currently clogging the nation’s credit system. And remember, if we don’t do this and the credit system shuts down, businesses and individuals will find it hugely difficult to get loans, and the economy will grind to a halt. The cost of such an event would be incalculable.

Colson goes on later to discuss opportunities that the Church has to minister to people during this crisis.  Huckabee later shares some suggestions for Congress that he feels would help the economy out.

1. Eliminate ALL capital gains taxes and taxes on savings and dividends right now. Free up the capital and encourage investment. This is the   kind of  economic stimulus the Fair Tax would bring and if Congress is going to lose money, let them lose it with lower taxes, not with public dollar bailouts of  private market mistakes.

2. Repeal Sarbanes/Oxley. It has failed. It was supposed to prevent this. It didn’t. Kill it

3.  Demand that the executives who steered their ships into the ground be forced to pay back the losses of their companies. Of course, they can’t, so let  them work and give back to the government and they can live like the people they put on the streets or kept there. It makes no sense to put them in jail—that’s just more they will cost you and me. I’d rather them go out and earn money—just not get to keep so much of it this time. I’m not talking about limiting CEO salaries—just those of the people who now are up in Washington begging for help because they ruined their companies.

What do you think about their statements?  Where do you stand on this “rescue plan”?  Also what do you think about Governor Huckabee’s suggestions?

    18 comments
    1. I think that congress needs to stay in session for another month and get a plan in place that is well thought out and has appropriate oversight to insure that further incompetence and corruption is limited.

    2. I think that congress needs to stay in session for another month and get a plan in place that is well thought out and has appropriate oversight to insure that further incompetence and corruption is limited.

    3. I think that congress needs to stay in session for another month and get a plan in place that is well thought out and has appropriate oversight to insure that further incompetence and corruption is limited.

    4. I am really torn on this one. Both Huckabee and Colson make good points. I hate to see a bailout of people who were arrogant in their business practices, allowed this asset valuation bubble to grow and fester then expect to be taken off the hook.

      And trust me, arrogance ran rampant for years. I was in business at a fairly high level and saw plenty of it, and to my shame, probably demonstrated enough of my own personal hubris at times.

      However, if we do not get market stability, not only big corporations get hurt. lots and lots of regular people have a significant portion of their retirement wealth invested in the market. They will be hurt as well. And unlike the bigger fish, they do not have the financial resiliency to bounce back as fast. So people within a few years of retirement might find themselves working much longer to get where they need to be.

      What we need is a little of both. A well reasoned work out plan that does not reward those who made the mess with big paydays. Oversight that makes sense and not just mountains of paper.

      I am not sure the government can do that in a few days, it takes time to put something together that will stand the test of time. But a bi-partisan stance that says we will fix the system might go a long way to calm the waters while the details are hammered out. I fear quick solutions that cause more long term problems in an attempt to give a quick fix.

    5. I am really torn on this one. Both Huckabee and Colson make good points. I hate to see a bailout of people who were arrogant in their business practices, allowed this asset valuation bubble to grow and fester then expect to be taken off the hook.

      And trust me, arrogance ran rampant for years. I was in business at a fairly high level and saw plenty of it, and to my shame, probably demonstrated enough of my own personal hubris at times.

      However, if we do not get market stability, not only big corporations get hurt. lots and lots of regular people have a significant portion of their retirement wealth invested in the market. They will be hurt as well. And unlike the bigger fish, they do not have the financial resiliency to bounce back as fast. So people within a few years of retirement might find themselves working much longer to get where they need to be.

      What we need is a little of both. A well reasoned work out plan that does not reward those who made the mess with big paydays. Oversight that makes sense and not just mountains of paper.

      I am not sure the government can do that in a few days, it takes time to put something together that will stand the test of time. But a bi-partisan stance that says we will fix the system might go a long way to calm the waters while the details are hammered out. I fear quick solutions that cause more long term problems in an attempt to give a quick fix.

    6. I am really torn on this one. Both Huckabee and Colson make good points. I hate to see a bailout of people who were arrogant in their business practices, allowed this asset valuation bubble to grow and fester then expect to be taken off the hook.

      And trust me, arrogance ran rampant for years. I was in business at a fairly high level and saw plenty of it, and to my shame, probably demonstrated enough of my own personal hubris at times.

      However, if we do not get market stability, not only big corporations get hurt. lots and lots of regular people have a significant portion of their retirement wealth invested in the market. They will be hurt as well. And unlike the bigger fish, they do not have the financial resiliency to bounce back as fast. So people within a few years of retirement might find themselves working much longer to get where they need to be.

      What we need is a little of both. A well reasoned work out plan that does not reward those who made the mess with big paydays. Oversight that makes sense and not just mountains of paper.

      I am not sure the government can do that in a few days, it takes time to put something together that will stand the test of time. But a bi-partisan stance that says we will fix the system might go a long way to calm the waters while the details are hammered out. I fear quick solutions that cause more long term problems in an attempt to give a quick fix.

    7. Agreed with Colson, and on the suggestions except for #3– that’s a really bad precident.

      I’m for filing criminal fraud charges against those who cooked the books to get themselves a bonus, though, and requiring the bonuses and a fine to be payed back–but basically making folks into indentured slaves because of poor planning and/or being a popular target of ire…ew.

    8. Agreed with Colson, and on the suggestions except for #3– that’s a really bad precident.

      I’m for filing criminal fraud charges against those who cooked the books to get themselves a bonus, though, and requiring the bonuses and a fine to be payed back–but basically making folks into indentured slaves because of poor planning and/or being a popular target of ire…ew.

    9. Agreed with Colson, and on the suggestions except for #3– that’s a really bad precident.

      I’m for filing criminal fraud charges against those who cooked the books to get themselves a bonus, though, and requiring the bonuses and a fine to be payed back–but basically making folks into indentured slaves because of poor planning and/or being a popular target of ire…ew.

    Comments are closed.

    Get CT In Your Inbox!

    Don't miss a single update.

    You May Also Like

    Something every child needs – three parents.

    I just read an article on Fox News about a Ontario boy…

    Quote of the Day: Charles Colson

    In today’s clash of worldviews, it is a fallacy that decisions are…

    Regarding the Tragic Shooting at Ft. Hood

    You’ve probably already heard about the shooting that took place today at…

    Should Christians help alleviate pain?

    I’m sorry that I’ve been doing so much political blogging lately (not…