Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) thinks so.

When it was law it did a couple of things: It required broadcasters to devote some of their airtime to discussing controversial matters of public interest, and to air contrasting views regarding those matters. Stations were given wide latitude as to how to provide contrasting views: It could be done through news segments, public affairs shows or editorials.

Should this really be the government’s role?  Is ensuring “balance” in political speech the same as restricting pornography?  I don’t think so.  Right now it only applies to radio (which conservatives tend to dominate), but doesn’t apply anywhere else.  Not to say that it couldn’t eventually be extended to cable and the internet.  Slippery slope.  Schumer interview below:

HT: Hot Air

You May Also Like

Is Criticizing Vander Plaats Marginalizing Marriage?

Bryan English of Iowa Family PAC (Iowa Family Policy Center, IFPC ACTION)…

Barmen Declaration: Understanding of Church and State

From the Barmen Declaration drafted on May 29, 1934 in Barmen, Germany…

North Korea Rattling Saber at Hawaii

Well, the North Koreans are at it again.  This time it is…

Baby, It’s Cold (No Hot!) Outside

There is very little reliable historical data and attributing every extreme of weather to climate change is not reasonable, not science, and not honest.