Former Vice President Dick Cheney was scheduled to speak yesterday on National Security.  President Barack Obama then scheduled a speech as well.  It provided for a great national security debate that never really occurred during the campaign.  The Washington Post put together a great contrast video of the speeches.


Wilson and Fletcher of the Washington Post report:

Obama’s appearance at the National Archives had the feel of a campaign event, one aimed at convincing the American public and a recalcitrant Democratic Congress that strict adherence to the rule of law combined with an embrace of civil liberties is the most effective way to defeat America’s enemies. Although Obama has recently adopted some elements of his predecessor’s policies on terrorism trials and secrecy, he said that during the Bush administration, "too often we set those principles aside as luxuries we could no longer afford."

When is he going to stop being the Campaigner-in-Chief and be the Commander-in-Chief?  When is he going to learn that his position on this manner is not in touch with the American people?  The people through Congress rebuked his position on Gitmo.  There will be a point in time when he is going to have to stop blaming the Bush Administration and take responsibility for his decisions.

Cheney also reminded us of the atmosphere and the threat that we faced.  How soon we forget.

We could count on almost universal support back then, because everyone understood the environment we were in. We’d just been hit by a foreign enemy – leaving 3,000 Americans dead, more than we lost at Pearl Harbor. In Manhattan, we were staring at 16 acres of ashes. The Pentagon took a direct hit, and the Capitol or the White House were spared only by the Americans on Flight 93, who died bravely and defiantly.

Everyone expected a follow-on attack, and our job was to stop it. We didn’t know what was coming next, but everything we did know in that autumn of 2001 looked bad. This was the world in which al-Qaeda was seeking nuclear technology, and A. Q. Khan was selling nuclear technology on the black market. We had the anthrax attack from an unknown source. We had the training camps of Afghanistan, and dictators like Saddam Hussein with known ties to Mideast terrorists.

These are just a few of the problems we had on our hands. And foremost on our minds was the prospect of the very worst coming to pass – a 9/11 with nuclear weapons.

That what was at stake, and still is at stake.  President Obama has made some wise decisions regarding Afghanistan.  Other National Security decisions, not so much.  We need a leader, not a campaigner.  When you compare the transcripts of the two speeches it becomes clear who lacks the expertise and wisdom regarding keeping us safe.  It isn’t Vice President Cheney.

Update: The 10 punches Dick Cheney landed on Barack Obama’s jaw

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to receive stimulating conservative Christian commentary in your inbox.

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
  1. Christian Science Monitor postulated Obama starting his speech 30+ minutes late might have been an effort for Cheney's not to get coverage as Cheney was slated to speak a few minutes after Obama's speech was supposed to begin. I thought that was an interesting theory.

  2. I wouldn't expect you to agree with me that Obama is clueless when it comes to national security.

    So keeping our homeland safe the last seven years has been a failure?

  3. Cheney's daughter Liz has been a very articulate and informative force in this debate. I am convinced that VP Cheney has good motivations in this debate.. I am glad that he is speaking out.. he is being heard by people (like me) who were not his biggest fans when he was in office.

Comments are closed.

You May Also Like

Health Care Shift from Private to Public

The Heritage Foundation and The Lewin Group released an analysis of the…

The Party’s Over, Part One: Why Trump Can’t be Beaten in the Primaries

Adam Graham: The painful truth is Trump is undefeatable in the Republican primaries. The primary system is still a frontloaded mess with most states voting early in the process. It’s unlikely there will be any major changes.

What Do Sarah Palin, John Kerry and Federal Judges Have in Common?

What do Jews, blacks, an advertising reviewer, New Yorkers in general, President…

Legal Definitions Do Matter

Mollie Hemingway made some great points the other day about why changing…