G.K. Chesterton in his classic Orthodoxy points out the absurdity of denying the existence of original sin:

Certain new theologians dispute original sin, which is the only part of Christian theology which can really be proved.  Some followers… in their almost too fastidious spirituality, admit divine sinlessness, which they cannon see even in their dreams.  But they essentially deny human sin, which they can see in the street.  The strongest saints and the strongest skeptics alike took positive evil as the starting-point of their argument.  If it can be true (as it certainly is) that a man can feel exquisite happiness in skinning a cat, then the religious philosopher can draw only draw one of two deductions.  He must either deny the existence of God, as all atheists do; or he must deny the present union between God and man, as all Christians do.  The new theologians seem to think it a highly rationalistic solution to deny the cat, (pg. 28).

You May Also Like

Are Pictures Depicting Jesus to Be Considered Idolatry?

In a previous church that I attended there was a debate on…

The Gospel Alternative for This Election

Can a Christian vote for a Mormon? Pastor Don Green of Truth Community Fellowship in Petersburg, KY says no as doing so, he says, does not elevate Christ.

Will We Choose Life or Death? Despair or Hope?

Robin Williams in the height of his despair chose his own physical death. We all have the choice of life or death, despair or hope before us today.

Evangelicals: Plague of Protestant Progress?

Well, not really, but it seems like those of us who consider…