G.K. Chesterton in his classic Orthodoxy points out the absurdity of denying the existence of original sin:

Certain new theologians dispute original sin, which is the only part of Christian theology which can really be proved.  Some followers… in their almost too fastidious spirituality, admit divine sinlessness, which they cannon see even in their dreams.  But they essentially deny human sin, which they can see in the street.  The strongest saints and the strongest skeptics alike took positive evil as the starting-point of their argument.  If it can be true (as it certainly is) that a man can feel exquisite happiness in skinning a cat, then the religious philosopher can draw only draw one of two deductions.  He must either deny the existence of God, as all atheists do; or he must deny the present union between God and man, as all Christians do.  The new theologians seem to think it a highly rationalistic solution to deny the cat, (pg. 28).

You May Also Like

Was Jesus Tempted By Homosexuality?

John Piper answers a tough question based on Hebrews 4:15: For we…

C.S. Lewis: Lord or Lunatic, But Never Good Teacher

Kelvey Vander Hart: As C.S. Lewis reminds us, you can call Jesus either Lord or lunatic, but never just a good teacher.

God’s People Were Chosen In The Furnace of Affliction

Charles Spurgeon commenting on Acts 14:22, specifically where is says, “through many…

Christianity Claims to Give an Account of Facts

Trevin Wax had this quote from C.S. Lewis on his blog.  I…