For those of you who were hoping for more policy talk (unlike the Oprah interview) in some of Governor Sarah Palin’s interviews this week for her new book Going Rogue: An American Life.  The interview she did with Rush Limbaugh this afternoon provides that.

The transcript can be found here.  Some excerpts below…

On job creation & the current unemployment rate:

It’s over 10%, and in fact it could be closer to 17 or 18 when you consider those who have kind of given up and not applying for unemployment benefits. So it’s bad, it’s really bad and then of course Fed Chair Bernanke announced that there are still weak job prospects for the very short term and probably long term, and that’s an uncomfortable place for our country to be.  What we need to do is shift gears and really head in another direction because what we’re doing right now with the fed, it’s not working. We need to cut taxes on the job creators.  This is all about jobs, creating jobs.  We have to ramp up industry here in America, and of course reduce the federal debt, quit piling on and growing more.  But those common sense solutions there, especially with the cutting taxes on the job creators, that’s not even being discussed.  In fact, increased taxes is the direction it sounds like Obama wants to go.

She pretty much put to rest any speculation that she’ll start or run with a third party:

You know, to be brutally honest, I think that it’s a bit naive when you talk about the pragmatism that has to be applied in America’s political system. And we are a two-party system. Ideally, sure, a third party or an independent party would be able to soar and thrive and put candidates forth and have them elected, but I don’t think America is ready for that.  I think that it is… Granted it’s quite conventional and traditional, but in a good way that we have our two parties, and I think that that’s what will remain. And I say that, though, acknowledging that I’m not an obsessive panther, I understand why people — good people like my own husband — refuse to register in a party. Todd’s not a Republican and yet he’s got more common sense conservatism than a whole lot of Republicans that I know because he is one who sees the idiosyncrasies of the characters within the machine and it frustrates him along with a whole lot of other Americans who choose to be independent.  But in answer to your question, I don’t think that the third party movement will be what’s necessary to usher in some common-sense conservative ideals.

Palin on our greatest challenge with energy:

And our greatest challenge with energy is that we’re not tapping it to the abundant domestic supplies that God created right underfoot on American soil and under our waters. It’s ridiculous that we are circulating hundreds of billions of dollars a year in foreign countries, asking them to ramp up production so that we can purchase it from them — especially from the regimes that can control us via energy, using it as a weapon against us, potentially. It’s nonsense that this administration and past administrations haven’t really understood yet that inherent link between energy and security. I think more and more Americans are waking up to the fact, though, and we will hopefully see changes there soon.

On her thoughts on the health care reform bills:

Well, we don’t really know, do we, what’s in that Senate version, the Senate consideration? It will be soon but we have no idea of costs. We don’t know how many will be insured. We’re waiting to hear that. We don’t know if the tax funding of abortions will be in this new version that’s sitting over on the Senate side. We don’t know if those who choose not to purchase this government-mandated level of coverage will face jail time as punishment. There are so many questions unanswered. I don’t like the idea, in general, of the federal government thinking it needs to take over health care — which essentially this is — and control one-sixth of our economy. Not when there are common-sense solutions to meeting health care challenges in our country, like allowing the intra- and interstate competition with insurers, tort reform, cutting down on the waste and fraud that the Obama administration insists if we just did that we’ll pay for this one-point-some trillion-dollar health care reform package. So lots of common sense solutions that need to be plugged in before ever considering federal government taking it over.

Her thoughts on National Security, our threats:

Well, I think domestically a threat that we’re facing right now is the dithering and hesitation in sending a message to the terrorists that we’re going to claim what Ronald Reagan claimed. Our motto is going to be: "We win, you lose." The way that we do that is allow McChrystal to have the reinforcements that he’s asking for in Afghanistan. That sends that message to the terrorists over there that we’re going to end this thing with our victory. We need to start facing Iran with tougher and tougher sanctions that need to be considered. We need to work our allies with the Iranian issues, like Britain and France and not allow access to favorable international monetary deals. That’s a great threat that I think would kind of shake up Ahmadinejad and get him to listen. We need to look at halting Iran’s imports of refined petroleum products. They’re quite reliant on imported gasoline, and we need to use that hammer to wake up the leadership there, too. Those are two big challenges that we have right now, domestically and in naming those two countries, Afghanistan and Iran. Two big challenges there, too.

For a an interview that was less than 20 minutes they covered a lot of ground.  Be sure to listen (above) or read the whole thing.

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to receive stimulating conservative Christian commentary in your inbox.

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
  1. Excellent interview, intelligent, substative, on target, and much needed after the “fluff” questions from MSM interviewers. Rush was great and Sarah, as always, what a blessing of strength. No doubt the liberals and MSM are opposed and “shake in fear” of Sarah and her strength, no nonsense political solutions and her future political role on behalf of this country. God bless her and Rush.
    .-= ReformedWomen´s last blog ..Our God is on Our Side =-.

  2. Thanks for the link and the audio Shane.

    I wish Palin would have said more about how she would cut taxes and reduce govt. That seems to be the mantra of many conservatives until they get in office. Need to hear the specifics.

    I guess I am not comfortable with her hawkish approach to Afghanistan. I would be interested in hearing a bit more about her end-game/exit strategy. We could be over there a long time unless we have a clear strategy and achievable goals.. we need to know what winning looks like.
    .-= Kansas Bob´s last blog ..The Rules of First Contact =-.

    1. @Kansas Bob, I do as well, but with 20 minutes you can only get into so much. Hopefully we’ll hear more or perhaps it’ll be in the book.

      Well, as you know, I think Obama needs to send the troops McChrystal is asking for. I don’t see how “hawkish” she’s being other than agreeing with the commanders on the ground. If your goal is not to win (accomplish mission), why be there? But I don’t disagree with you that we need a clear strategy and achievable goals.

  3. A little note on health care from someone who has voted Republican for the last twenty years.

    I applied for some health insurance from a well known Iowa insurance company about three weeks ago. When I get the application back there are two amendments attached for conditions I’ve never had, and I can’t get an explanation as to why they attached the riders.

    Most people who have group health insurance through their employers or government have no idea how difficult it is to get health insurance when you are self employed. I’m not big on the Democratic health plans, but I get tired of some of our Republican senators and representatives who don’t understand the problems hard working people have with their health insurance. I’m very socially conservative, and believe in a free market economy, but not when the companies put profits above the welfare of people. A health care company should be doing what’s good for both people and profits.

    1. @Tom, What would that look like? And I certainly don’t want to defend companies that use shady practices to deny people health insurance.

      Part of the problem is the cost of health care itself, and is that being addressed with this bill. Also we (meaning Americans) tend, when we have insurance, to not always use the best judgment. For instance, going to the doctor when we’ve just had a flu bug because we only have a $10 co-pay. Or going to get X-Rays for a twisted ankle.

      If we had to pay the bills, perhaps we’d make better choices.

      Something we need to consider is allowing individuals/small businesses to group together to have purchasing power like companies do (with the same rules). Also explore HSAs coupled with major medical/high deductable plans (so we have more control of our medical spending). Also tort reform.

      None of this would require a government takeover.

Comments are closed.

You May Also Like

The Federal Budget and Morality

John Hendrickson: Coolidge regarded “a good budget as among the noblest monuments of virtue” and believed that the issue of taxation was also a moral issue.

U.S. Civil Rights Commissioner Points Out Threats to Religious Liberty in CA, DC

U.S. Civil Rights Commissioner takes the California Dept. of Managed Health Care and DC City Council to task over actions that violate religious freedom.

Sending Bombs to Anyone Is Evil

Shane Vander Hart: Let’s jettison the hot takes about bombs sent to Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and CNN and let law enforcement do their thing.

“Classy” Wonkette Smears Trig Palin

William Jacobson yesterday wonders why some adults (probably using the word loosely)…