Today’s installment from the latest Iowa Poll that The Des Moines Register commissioned asked Iowans polled what issues should the Iowa Legislature consider this year.  For those of you who live outside of Iowa may not be aware, this year’s General Assembly has a shortened session this year in order to cut costs.  This week is funnel week to see what bill will end up going to the floor to be debated on, and which ones will get killed in committee.

Again they are asking the wrong question.  Before they asked whether or not the Iowa Supreme Court’s decision has impacted their life.  Now they are asking whether or not the Iowa Legislature should spend their time on it.

62% of Iowans surveyed said it isn’t worth the Legislature’s time.  The only issue offered that the majority said is worth their time was a ban on texting while driving with 72% saying it’s worth their time.  Why is this?

Well, Senate Majority Leader Mike Gronstal has already said it won’t happen.  Nobody thinks the votes are there to get it done.  I personally don’t know of anybody holding out hope for a legislative vote this session.  I know I’m not.  Does that mean Iowans think it’s unimportant?

I don’t think so.  Ask the right question, should Iowans be allowed to vote on a definition of marriage and the last poll that asked that the overwhelming majority said yes.  But I’m sure that the Legislative Democrats will spin this to say they aren’t wasting their time.

I do like what Iowa House Minority Leader Kraig Paulsen (R-Hiawatha) had to say in response to that argument:

"The majority party has successfully convinced people that that’s something that takes a lengthy period of time," Paulsen said. "There’s no reason it should have to take more than 30 minutes."

But when you have a shortened session, a budget shortfall problem, a clear public safety issue in front of the General Assembly, and the Democratic leadership who will stonewall any attempt to pass a ban.

What do you think people will say?

Perhaps I’m wrong.  Maybe those of us who advocate for this have it wrong.  I’d like to see Democrats prove me and many others wrong, let us vote.  I think if it’s on the ballot we know what the outcome will be which is why we see the delay tactics.  Since that isn’t likely to happen with the current makeup in the Iowa House and Senate I think we need to start seriously considering a Constitutional Convention and send the Iowa Supreme Court justices who are up for retention this year packing.

3 comments
  1. Great ideas here, Shane. Let’s put the question “Should Iowans be allowed to vote on a definition of marriage?” on the ballot this fall and see what happens. My guess is that Iowans will likely wonder, still, why you’d be wasting their time with these sorts of pedantic maneuvers.

    1. @dustin, It would be a waste of time to have that on the ballot this fall. That isn’t what I said. I was talking about asking the right question when you poll people.

      Nothing will be able to be on the ballot regarding this in November.

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

Day 10: Rod Roberts for Lt. Governor: It’s Time For Governor Branstad to Decide the Future of Iowa GOP

Our official press release for the final day: Day 10 of the…

Iowa Libertarians Request Help from Gov. Reynolds for Presidential Ballot Access

The Libertarian Party of Iowa requested that Gov. Kim Reynolds waive the petitioning requirements for their presidential candidate in light of COVID-19.

Vander Hart: My Approach to Iowa’s Judicial Retention Elections in 2020

Shane Vander Hart shares his thoughts about Iowa’s judicial retention elections that voters can find on the back of the ballot in 2020.

Over 12,000 Iowans Tested for COVID-19 Antibodies

The Iowa Department of Public Health gave 12,404 Iowans a serology test, with 14 percent testing positive for COVID-19 antibodies to date.