Anytime I talk about Bob Vander Plaats, I feel like I have to clarify that I really like the guy overall.  Seems nice enough.  I’m with him philosophically on most everything outside of School Choice.  I also appreciate his zeal on the marriage issue.

However, I saw this video and it solidified my opinion that Vander Plaats may have the least effective plan for attacking the Marriage issue facing Iowa:

As I watch this I notice two things:

  1. He never fully explains the one thing that would give teeth to his Executive Order: Jurisdiction/Authority of the Governor.  I think he’s relying on Article IV sections 8 & 9 to explain how he’d have the authority to enforce the DOMA on County Recorders.  However, there are many at the capitol and elsewhere that insist the Governor does not have jurisdiction over elected county officials.  I need that explained from the Vander Plaats camp and have not yet.  Has this been done before in Iowa or a state with similar Constitutional Language
  2. Vander Plaats doesn’t even think it’ll really work.  Is he asking me to vote for him so he can embarrass and emasculate the movement to overturn the Supreme Court’s Ruling?  What I’m hearing from conservatives and liberals at the capitol backs up the argument in the article that it’d be hard to find a court anywhere that would agree with Vander Plaats’ argument he has authority over County Recorders or those authorized to solemnize marriages.

I’m left watching the Vander Plaats’ YouTube video explaining why the Constitutional Convention is such a bad idea and am confused.  He says it plays fast and loose with the Constitution.  It could also be argued that it’s the people’s way to send a mandate to Gronstal and Murphy they want a vote on marriage.  Sounds consistent with Vander Plaat’s populist message on the subject.

I feel I have two choices:  support Vander Plaats even though he thinks it will probably lead to his impeachment which would, in my opinion, set back the cause considerably or support the other candidates’ solutions including consensus building after an election that will hopefully change the political equation at the capitol, a Constitutional Convention initiated by the people, a judge retention vote that could instill fear in the judiciary, vetoes to stand off with the Legislature, etc.

In the meantime, social conservatives need to win over the hearts and minds of Iowans one at a time.  Can we rise to the challenge?  We’ve proven historically that we struggle to affect culture through the Biblical means of prayer and the loving of our neighbors and instead have relied largely on anger, protest, and the tip of the sword.  When church leaders passionately and lovingly lead their peers toward Truth and the political winds change favorably due to an engaged citizenry – only then will the Legislature and our Constitution truly reflect the will of the people.  I think we can all agree on that.

1 comment
  1. In the meantime, social conservatives need to win over the hearts and minds of Iowans one at a time. Can we rise to the challenge? We’ve proven historically that we struggle to affect culture through the Biblical means of prayer and the loving of our neighbors and instead have relied largely on anger, protest, and the tip of the sword. When church leaders passionately and lovingly lead their peers toward Truth and the political winds change favorably due to an engaged citizenry – only then will the Legislature and our Constitution truly reflect the will of the people.

    here here

    this is the biggest concern I have right now with some of my good friends in the social conservative movement,my question for them is when people see or hear them, are they witnessing the image of Christ?

    Its fine to be zealous, its noble to stand on principle, but often it comes across as phariseetic & self righteous instead.

    the movement right now seems bent more over personal emotion and self preservation rather than accomplishment and bringing more people to the kingdom of God

    Why are some so afraid of a constitutional convention? we keep saying that our ideas have better merit, that people identify with our beliefs,that we are looking for bold sustaining leadership, then why are we afraid to go this route? If its because we are afraid we’ll lose, that doesn’t inspire confidence in our leaders or ideas.

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

Sarah Palin & Bill O’Reilly on Obama’s Gulf Oil Spill Address

Did you watch President Barack Obama’s primetime address regarding the Gulf oil…

Freedom is Never Free

As we celebrate the freedom of our country, let us never forget that freedom is never free. And we have the responsibility to fight for that freedom.

Grassley: Preserving The Second Amendment

U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) defended the 2nd Amendment and introduced an amendment to strengthen the NICS background checks on the Senate floor.

Young Joins Bipartisan Effort to Curb Gun Violence

Together with a bipartisan group of colleagues, Congressman David Young (R-Iowa) introduced the Protecting our Communities and Rights Act of 2018.