image By Representative Linda Upmeyer

About a week ago, I was invited on a conference call with Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli to hear how his office filed suit against Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), over the Health Care bill.

The Attorney General is making the case that the action taken by Congress violated the Supremacy Clause, and the Federal law is unconstitutional because of its over-reach in the area of Commerce. The AG also argues that this has become prevalent behavior on the part of Congress ever since the New Deal.

I was glad to be on the call as I’m interested in his argument and whether it will be meritorious enough to prevail — because Iowa may have to do the same thing to protect your right to make your own health care decisions.

Over the past several months, in anticipation of passage of the health care bill, I filed and/or supported a number of amendments and bills aimed at protecting your health care choices: a Constitutional Amendment preserving the freedom of Iowans to provide for their own health care, a bill maintaining the health freedoms of Iowans, a bill asserting Iowa’s state sovereignty, a Rule 60 vote to allow consideration of the sovereignty bill, the Sorenson bill maintaining health freedom for Iowans, the House Republican Amendment on maintaining health freedom for Iowans, and the motion to allow consideration of the bill.

I used every mechanism I had available to get a law passed similar to the Virginia law to protect Iowan’s health care choices. (In essence, the Virginia law states that no subject of the Commonwealth could be required to purchase or maintain a policy of individual insurance coverage.)

The attempts made by myself and the House Republican Caucus all met with defeat, primarily along party lines.

If you’re a citizen of Iowa, the defeat of the House Republican Caucus legislation should be of grave concern to you. Because the kind of creeping incrementalism embodied in the health care bill only gets worse over time. And the longer people receive “entitlements” the less inclined they are to give them up.

This kind of top-down statist legislation has never worked as intended in the past. And it won’t work now. It will run up Trillions of dollars in debt, lead to rationing, and diminish you and your children’s quality of life.

That’s why it’s so important to for you to get involved and act now to defend our traditional understanding of federalism and the Constitution as it was intended by our Founders. Our standard of living was not achieved by statist wealth redistribution. It was achieved by free people acting in their best interest in a free market, with minimal interference from government — the antithesis of this health care bill.

How are your Constitutional rights damaged by the health care bill? There are many, but a few points for you to consider are:

  1. Never before has the Federal Government forced people to enter into commerce (purchasing insurance) as a condition of citizenship.
  2. Congress has the power to regulate commerce, but not the power to force individuals to enter commerce.

    For the very first time, they will have to assume that doing nothing (not owning insurance) constitutes commerce. If the federal government can force anyone to purchase insurance, what stops them from telling us we each have to buy a new Chevy every five years? After all, wouldn’t it save money in the long run? We could keep the company in the black and prevent job loss at the same time.

  3. You will hear people say this is like Social Security and Medicare, but that is not correct.

    Both were handled as payroll taxes. This mandate is not, and a tax is never mentioned in the legislation. Rather, there is a penalty for not purchasing insurance. Congress plans to hire 16,000 new workers to enforce the penalty.

  4. Some will say that we have to buy car insurance and this is no different.

    Again, not true. You have to carry liability insurance to protect others, but there is no requirement to cover your personal losses.

(For a top 10 list of disastrous side effects of the Obama health care reform bill, See the Heritage Foundation Analysis.)

Because Virginia is in the 4th Judicial District, which is very fast, they expect a decision on the case by late summer. Most constitutional authorities believe this is a very good case, but most also worry that the Supreme Court will defer to Congress. On the other hand, some argue this is the most federalist leaning court in decades.

It’s ironic that the President signed this bill into law on the anniversary of Patrick Henry’s famous “Give me liberty or give me death” speech.

Some say this is the final blow to federalism, and that states’ rights will be dead if this suit fails.

But someone reminded me today that isn’t true as long as there are still people who care. How true! That is what this is all about!

The pleading on the Virginia AGs website can be found HERE. Then please Click Here to sign the petition.  AG Cuccinelli said that the signatures from all over the country will strengthen their case.

Please don’t take what has happened lightly or expect it to “just go away”. If you don’t take action you will be stuck with a European-style health care system that taxes you and your children’s children, buries them under mountains of debt, stifles economic growth, rations your health care, and diminishes you and your children’s quality of life.

It’s not too late to defend your health care freedom. Contact your legislators today!

Linda Upmeyer is an Iowa State Representative serving Iowa House District 12 (Franklin County, and parts of Hancock and Cerro Gordo Counties) and a cardiology nurse practitioner.

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to receive stimulating conservative Christian commentary in your inbox.

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
  1. You know, I’d expect a little less ignorance of the law coming from and elected official, Ms. Upmeyer, but I suppose that is just wishful thinking on my part. Therefore, I shall consider it a public service to educate you:

    You say that “a tax is never mentioned in the legislation,” and this is so wrong it is laughable. According to the Journal of Accountancy:

    “Among the many tax provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act are the following:

    Premium Assistance Credit
    The act provides for refundable tax credits that eligible taxpayers can use to help cover the cost of health insurance premiums for individuals and families who purchase health insurance through a state health benefit exchange (which each state is required to establish under section 1311 of the act). Under new IRS § 36B, an eligible individual will enroll in a plan offered through an exchange and report his or her income to the exchange. Based on the information provided to the exchange and his or her income, the individual will receive a premium assistance credit. Treasury will pay the premium assistance credit amount directly to the insurance plan in which the individual is enrolled. The individual will then pay to the plan in which he or she is enrolled the dollar difference between the premium tax credit amount and the total premium charged for the plan.”

    I look forward to your retraction.
    .-= Guy Incognito´s last blog ..Cyclopes =-.

    1. @Guy Incognito, You know, I don’t know what has changed with you, but you seem to have become more and more arrogant and disrespectful in your comments.

      I wouldn’t hold your breath for a response. I’m sure she’s got better things to do than debate people online.

      She said a tax isn’t mentioned, and you bring up a tax credit. Guy… they aren’t the same thing. Taxes are something you pay. Tax credits are something you receive.

      At least bring up an actual tax if you are going to provide a rebuttal. But I know that you are smarter than the Heritage Foundation, the Attorney General of Virginia, Representative Upmeyer and me combined, we so appreciate your taking the time to stoop down from your perch and educate and enlighten us.

      1. @Shane Vander Hart, It’s easy to be disrespectful and inappropriate when you are anonymous. I’m OK with anonymous posts if you are protecting your job or your employer or your family. But the burden is on your, then, not to be a jackass. If there is a way to block his IP, I’d highly recommend it, Shane.

  2. I followed the link and read the article on the potential fall outs of the health care plan. While something needed to be done, I am not hopeful that somehow the government is going to be able to run this effectively.
    .-= Steve´s last blog ..Bible Reading 2 Kings 4 – 6 =-.

Comments are closed.

You May Also Like

Branstad’s Condition of the State: The Good, The Bad and The Omitted

Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad’s Condition of the State address contained some good ideas,but it hardly outlined the bold agenda that is has been touted as.

Reynolds Says State’s Capacity to Care for COVID-19 Patients Is ‘Very Good’

Gov. Kim Reynolds: “As we are seeing across all RMCC regions, Iowa’s capacity to care for COVID-19 patients and available resources are very good at this time.”

Watch: Grassley and Ernst Give Opening Remarks at Barrett Confirmation Hearing

U.S. Senators Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, gave opening remarks during the the confirmation hearing of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court.

Kraig Paulsen: The First Week

By Iowa House Speaker Kraig Paulsen The 84th General Assembly got underway…