A follow-up on yesterday’s post.  From Shelly Jerret, President of Wright Elementary’s PTA:

The Keith Haring video that was shown to Des Moines Children by Wright Elementary art teacher Karen Maresh crossed a line and needs to be dealt with in such a way that both sends a strong message to other teachers, and which will help to repair the trust that has been breached with parents and students. 

According to the Des Moines Register, school officials are refusing to make the findings of their investigation public, and that they will not tell parents how the situation is ultimately handled. That is unacceptable.  Parents trust their children to the care of public school teachers and deserve to know that inappropriate actions like those of Ms. Maresh are dealt with appropriately.  The school district cannot expect parents to trust them if they fail to behave in a trustworthy and transparent manner.

The sort of sexually graphic imagery that Wright Elementary students were exposed to was not only offensive, but very likely criminal.

Reports from last evening indicate that Ms. Maresh will not face criminal charges. However, a Google search of Iowa Code on pornography leads to section 728.2 which deals with the “dissemination and exhibition of obscene material to minors.”  According to that portion of Iowa law, “Any person, other than the parent or guardian of the minor, who knowingly disseminates or exhibits obscene material to a minor, including the exhibition of obscene material so that it can be observed by a minor on or off the premises where it is displayed, is guilty of a public offense and shall upon conviction be guilty of a serious misdemeanor.” It seems fairly obvious that this is what happened.

So, in addition to the school administration rushing to shield a teacher from the public scrutiny that should result from her poor choices, we also have a county attorney who is unwilling to represent the most innocent and defenseless members of our community.  Our children deserve better.

This school year is nearly over.  With less than two weeks left, the administration may hope that this will all blow over during the summer months.  I am asking other parents to join me in demanding strong action and complete transparency as this process moves forward.  We are not required to send our children to public schools, and this is exactly the sort of event in the life of a school district that causes parents like myself to give serious consideration to other options for educating our children.

The eyes of the community are on Wright Elementary, and the credibility of the entire Des Moines Public School District is on the line.  It is now up to them to do the right thing.

5 comments
  1. Inappropriate for 9-year-olds. Probably (parents should at least have been warned and given the chance to opt-out). Obscene or criminal? Not very likely. But that won’t be for me to decide. Thanks to You Tube you can reach your own conclusion. The video is easy enough to find. The statute is below, including the definition of “obscene material.”

    “Dissemination and exhibition of obscene material to minors.
    Any person, other than the parent or guardian of the minor, who knowingly disseminates or exhibits obscene material to a minor, including the exhibition of obscene material so that it can be observed by a minor on or off the premises where it is displayed, is guilty of a public offense and shall upon conviction be guilty of a serious misdemeanor.” Iowa Code 728.2:

    “‘Obscene material’ is any material depicting or describing the genitals, sex acts, masturbation, excretory functions or sadomasochistic abuse which the average person, taking the material as a whole and applying contemporary community standards with respect to what is suitable material for minors, would find appeals to the prurient interest and is patently offensive; and the material, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, scientific, political or artistic value.” 728.1.5.

    1. Haring’s official website acknowledges that the images are sexually explicit and not appropriate for children. Go here and read the red letters.
      http://www.haring.com/

      “IMPORTANT PARENTAL ADVISORY: Some of these exhibitions contain artwork of a sexually explicit nature that is not appropriate for children and that some people may find offensive. We recommend that children have restricted access to this site.
      Please click on the “Kids” link above to visit http://www.haringkids.com, a website developed specifically for children.”

      You say “probably” as to whether the images are inappropriate for elementary children? We’re talking about images of an orgy and two males in a sexual act. You can’t even firmly say “yes”?

      The teacher should at minimum be fired from her job.

  2. You should absolutely consider other options for educating your children. You seem like a great candidate for home schooling.

  3. I’ve been a prosecutor and looked at the video. I highly doubt a conviction would stand on the face of it. They’re inappropriate, but not even in the neighborhood of obscene.

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

Classical Literature Is Just Too Time Consuming

Caffeinated Carolina posted on South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley’s support of a…

Complaint Against Next Generation Science Standards Filed in Federal Court

Citizens for Objective Public Education, Inc. filed suit against the Kansas Department of Education and State Board of Education over their adoption of the Next Generation Science Standards.

School Funding Trumps Student Privacy

The Northside Independent School District in San Antonio, TX decided to allow school funding to trump student privacy when starting their tracking program.

Iowa Puts Common Core Assessments on Hold

The Iowa Legislature removed Smarter Balanced Assessments from education reform bill and paused any Common Core Assessments until 2016-17 school year.