image Presser from Preserve Innocence:

Sexually explicit program shocks parents, threatens the innocence of children

Washington, DC – “This is not your father’s sex ed class anymore. And yet, parents still don’t know that ‘Abstinence-Plus’ now means ‘Abstinence-plus-practice-putting-on-a-condom,’” stated Emmett McGroarty, Director of Preserve Innocence, an initiative of the American Principles Project dedicated to defending the innocence of children and the sovereignty of the family. Mr. Mc Groarty was responding to the recent controversy that erupted in Shenandoah, Iowa over a graphic sex ed class given by Planned Parenthood at a local high school. The program, described as a lesson about STDs and safe sex, featured the use of anatomically-correct dolls to demonstrate sexual acts as well as a faux phallus to instruct students in condom use. With no prior notice given to the parents of the students attending the class (some of whom were as young as fourteen), many were shocked to learn that their child’s “sex education” was more like a “sex demonstration” than anything else.

“Too many parents are unaware that programs like the one in Iowa are becoming the norm in our schools, and that Planned Parenthood is a big part of this change,” continued Mr. Mc Groarty. “It’s shocking to consider the millions of dollars in taxpayer funding that go to helping a group that promotes sex ed programs so harmful to the innocence of children.”

“Of course, Planned Parenthood is not the only culprit here,” continued Eric Goranson, Director of the Iowa chapter of Preserve Innocence. “This is also a question of school boards, teachers, and administrators not informing and working with parents about the content of their classes. The school board in Shenandoah failed to obey the state’s rules on notifying parents and allowing them to opt-out of the program. But simply informing parents ahead of time that their children will be getting ‘sex ed’ is not enough. The whole truth needs be told about the content of these programs and their potential to undermine the family’s values and beliefs.”

“It is for this reason that Preserve Innocence is working to introduce greater transparency and accountability to our schools and to the Department of Education,” concluded Mr. McGroarty. “Not only do parents deserve to know what kinds of programs are being promoted in the classroom, but they also must have the right to say ‘No, not in our school’ to ‘classes’ that threaten the innocence of their children and undermine their family’s values.”

Background Reading:

4 comments
  1. Hey all you Iowa voters who supported Terry Branstad in the primary and/or plan to support him in the general. This stuff even creeping into our schools is HIS FAULT.

    Wake up.

    1. The current sex ed curriculum and law surrounding sex ed in Iowa are a direct result of the sex ed bill, penned by planned parenthood and revised by the D.E., passed into law during the 2007 legislative session and signed by Culver. I was there lobbying against it every step of the way as the lobbyist for Christian schools alongside the Iowa Catholic Conference. We were able to water it down but couldn’t find the votes to kill it outright.

      You are entitled to dislike Branstad…but at least have the decency to attribute the right facts to the right people. Culver signed the law that created this situation.

  2. Where do you want your kids to learn it then? on the streets? Maybe with a drunk stranger from a bar?

    Just think if your kids did not know this stuff and decide to say go to France for the Senior trip? Just watching some of that kind of T.V. is almost like porn over here. Not to say anything about the beaches over there. Most places on the beach (In some parts of France) are very open to public sexual acts.
    Most schools think the parents are a little bit scared to talk to the children about sex.
    So this way it is better to wait to have sex, but sometimes peer pressure says other things. So the school is telling your kids to use common sense and have protected sex.

    I should have had sex ed in Elementary School. I did not have it until I was in High school.
    One of my high school books was nothing there but sexual pictures and then the words to describe what they were doing.

    Most children develop at a very early age then we did. So it is better to teach them early then later. Or they will learn on their own.

    1. I want them to learn it at home with their parents. Also I want my children to practice abstinence.

      Let’s stop treating kids like they are a bunch of minks and can’t exercise some self-control.

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

“Nothing Worse” Than Homeschoolers Weighing In on Public School Policy

State Representative Josh Byrnes (R-Osage) believes that Iowa’s homeschooling parents should remain silent about public school policy.

Wis. Gov. Scott Walker Calls for Common Core Repeal

Gov. Scott Walker (R-Wisconsin) called on the Wisconsin State Legislature to pass legislation next session to repeal the Common Core State Standards.

Groups Protest NAEP Plan to Assess Student Mindsets

Dozens of groups have joined Liberty Counsel to object to the plan for the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) to assess student mindsets.

Dept. of Education “Authorized” Institutions?

This should surprise no one but it certainly should be alarming.  According…