image Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) pressed U.S. Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan on the limits of the federal government’s power under the commerce clause during her confirmation hearing today.  He referenced a fictitious law mandating that citizens eat three vegetables a day.  She said that it was a senseless law, but that Courts shouldn’t judge the constitutionality of a law on whether it makes sense.

This should have been a slam dunk question, of course the federal government shouldn’t be able to make a law telling us what to eat.  There is plenty of senseless government regulation passed under the guise of the commerce clause.

Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution states:

The Congress shall have Power… To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.

There is nothing in this clause, or in the Constitution as a whole, that gives the federal government any authority to mandate vegetable eating, involvement with education, or for that matter health care – especially telling people they have to have health insurance.

You can watch the exchange below:

You May Also Like

Sarah Palin: Domestic Drilling, Why We Can Still Believe

By Sarah Palin We’ve all been shocked and saddened by the tragic…

Starbucks Boycott? Controversies over Guns and Gays

Thursday, CNS News reported on a boycott against Starbucks by an anti-gun…

Domino’s Pizza Founder Wins Court Order Halting HHS Mandate

U.S. District Court Judge Lawrence Zatkoff granted Thomas Monighan and Domino’s Farm Corporation a court order halting the enforcement of the HHS mandate.

Ernst and Grassley Object to Dietary Guidelines Recommendations

U.S. Senators Joni Ernst and Chuck Grassley join letter urging Secretaries Sylvia Burwell and Tom Vilsack to reject recommendations on meat consumption.