ADVERTISEMENT

image Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) pressed U.S. Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan on the limits of the federal government’s power under the commerce clause during her confirmation hearing today.  He referenced a fictitious law mandating that citizens eat three vegetables a day.  She said that it was a senseless law, but that Courts shouldn’t judge the constitutionality of a law on whether it makes sense.

This should have been a slam dunk question, of course the federal government shouldn’t be able to make a law telling us what to eat.  There is plenty of senseless government regulation passed under the guise of the commerce clause.

Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution states:

The Congress shall have Power… To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.

There is nothing in this clause, or in the Constitution as a whole, that gives the federal government any authority to mandate vegetable eating, involvement with education, or for that matter health care – especially telling people they have to have health insurance.

You can watch the exchange below:

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to receive stimulating conservative Christian commentary in your inbox.

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
You May Also Like

Chicago Politics Moves to Washington

Chicago politics have come to reside at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, according to…

Questioner to Obama: “I’m Tired of Defending You.”

Wow.  Perhaps the kool aid is wearing off for some who voted…

2012 State of the Unborn Address

Yesterday, Marjorie Dannenfelser, President of the Susan B. Anthony List gave her…

Young Joins Bipartisan Effort to Curb Gun Violence

Together with a bipartisan group of colleagues, Congressman David Young (R-Iowa) introduced the Protecting our Communities and Rights Act of 2018.