image Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) pressed U.S. Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan on the limits of the federal government’s power under the commerce clause during her confirmation hearing today.  He referenced a fictitious law mandating that citizens eat three vegetables a day.  She said that it was a senseless law, but that Courts shouldn’t judge the constitutionality of a law on whether it makes sense.

This should have been a slam dunk question, of course the federal government shouldn’t be able to make a law telling us what to eat.  There is plenty of senseless government regulation passed under the guise of the commerce clause.

Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution states:

The Congress shall have Power… To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.

There is nothing in this clause, or in the Constitution as a whole, that gives the federal government any authority to mandate vegetable eating, involvement with education, or for that matter health care – especially telling people they have to have health insurance.

You can watch the exchange below:

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

Rod Blum Explains Vote Against Speaker Boehner’s Reelection

Congressman Rod Blum (R-IA) explained in a statement why he voted against Speaker John Boehner’s re-election to a third term as Speaker of the House.

President Obama and 168 House Members Support Gendercide

President Barack Obama continues to demonstrate that he is the most pro-abortion…

Palin Endorses Doug Hoffman in NY 23

Jim Geraghty broke this while it was yet a rumor, but now…

Doing Nothing Would Be Less Harmful Than Porkulus

According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, the Washington Times reports. President…