Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) impressed me with his rationale behind his decision to vote no on Solicitor General Elena Kagan’s nomination to the United State Supreme Court.  He brought up her work against the partial birth abortion ban, citing international law, her inability to defend DOMA, etc.  He cited her inability to discuss where our rights come from.  He brought up 12-13 reasons why he was voting no, and in my opinion made a great argument against her nomination.  I encourage you to watch the remarks in full below:

Contrast Senator Grassley’s action with the that of his colleague, Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC).  He said he would vote for Kagan’s nomination because he believes that elections matter.

Yes they do, somebody needs to primary Senator Graham and show him just how right he is.  Just because President Obama won the election doesn’t mean that you have to rubber stamp all of his nominations.

You May Also Like

Pelosi Spends Almost $600K to Save Loebsack’s Rubber Stamp; Attacks Miller-Meeks as a ‘Puppet’

Miller-Meeks: "I may be a short Mariannette, but I’m nobody’s puppet" OTTUMWA,…

Justice Department: Tolerance Trumps Freedom

Department of Justice’s brief arguing against a Romeike Rehearing said German laws banning homeschooling are to create an “open, pluralistic society.”

AIPAC 2012 Begins With a Bang

Jane Harman, former democratic congresswoman from California’s 36th district, and Liz Cheney,…

FreedomWorks Staff Member, Tabitha Hale, Assaulted By CWA Union Member

Tabitha Hale the New Media Director at FreedomWorks (formerly with Smart Girl…