image DES MOINES – Iowa For Freedom continues to educate Iowa voters about their right to vote on the retention of three Iowa Supreme Court justices and hold the court in check while opponents of the grassroots efforts demonstrate the ballot initiative is more about protecting politicians and judicial activism.

Politicians continue to use scare tactics in an effort to strong-arm voters and misinform them about Iowa For Freedom’s effort to unseat three Iowa Supreme Court justices in November, Iowa for Freedom State Chair Bob Vander Plaats said Monday.

“Get involved, take it personal and tell a friend or family member,” Vander Plaats said. “It’s obvious politicians are nervous about the strides Iowa for Freedom are making as we get closer to the November election. Iowans are paying attention and listening. Make no mistake on November 2, politicians will learn voters understand middle school civics more than they have been given credit.”

Iowa voters are doing their homework, and understand all their freedoms are in jeopardy, Vander Plaats said.

“They are listening when Polk County District Court Judge Robert Hanson calls their right to vote on the retention issue misguided and an abuse of the system” Vander Plaats said. “They are listening and paying close attention when opponents say not to interject politics into the judicial system; yet another opposition group is being chaired by two former lieutenant governors.”

Iowa For Freedom Campaign Manager Chuck Laudner agrees.

“This is exactly what Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor addressed earlier this month: politicians speaking out and trying to control our judicial system,” Laudner said.

Vander Plaats, Iowa For Freedom and volunteers are blanketing the state educating Iowans about the importance of voting no on the retention issue.

“The retention vote is to hold the court accountable,” Vander Plaats said. “It is not to pat (the justices) on the back and say retain them. Iowa For Freedom’s efforts are focused solely on the retention of the justices, not the selection process.”

5 comments
    1. Upholding the Constitution and the rights of everyone is “overstepping” their boundaries? Apparently you agree with the attitude of the Third Reich where judges who don’t “do as they are told” are removed.

  1. By all means, follow the example of Germany in 1939 and get rid of judges who follow the constitution and ignore the party line. When judges can be removed for unpopular decisions, then the freedom and justice of the US will be a thing of the past. People who support removing judges for unpopular decisions show their contempt and down right hatred for America and what we stand for.

    1. Sure, you think that only because they are making decisions you agree with.

      It’s the same asinine contention that our current judicial nomination process isn’t political.

      That’s a farce.

      1. Your contempt for America and the American judicial systems is duly noted. However, please also note, that many of us love our country and find people who would destroy our judicial system just as abhorrent as the terrorists of 9/11.

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

Branstad-Reynolds Release 5th Ad in Iowa Gubernatorial Race

(Urbandale, IA) The Branstad-Reynolds campaign today released its fifth TV ad for…

Let’s Work: Branstad Advances Policy to Promote the Iowa Entrepreneur

Branstad puts forward three-pronged approach to assist educational and start-up efforts. (ANKENY)…

Let’s Get Real About Spending

John Hendrickson: Iowa policymakers should seriously consider a state spending limitation amendment. Strengthening Iowa’s spending limitation would finally place taxpayers first.

A Review of the Iowa Senate Procedural Process

As we complete our 3rd week of the session, the Iowa Senate procedural process begins to have an impact on what issues we ultimately will get to vote on.