ADVERTISEMENT

A reader forwarded the text of a robocall that numerous Iowans have received from AFA Action targeting Chief Justice Marsha Ternus.

Imagine you’re a sheriff’s deputy. In the middle of the night, you’re dispatched to the home of Marsha Ternus, chief justice of the state Supreme Court. What you don’t expect to find at the home of Iowa’s chief justice is an illegal underage drinking party, her son and six other teens surrounded by, quote, “countless beer cans,” and preparing to drive home. You arrest them. You do your duty. It’s against the law. But you didn’t expect having to arrest Marsha Ternus’s husband too, another prominent lawyer, for obstructing your sworn duty. He’ll get twelve months probation. But you can’t help thinking: Is this any example for young people? Does it speak respect for the law? Adult responsibility? Does it make your job any easier, when the state’s chief judicial officer claims she was asleep at the switch? Should someone who doesn’t meet such minimum standards remain chief justice of the Iowa Supreme Court? No. Vote No on retention of Justice Marsha Ternus. This message paid for by AFA Action, including our many supporters here in Iowa.

I’ve heard a similar radio ad, and I want to be consistent.  I hate personal attacks regardless of who does them.

While I am voting no on retention, this isn’t the reason why.  I read about that case and was one of the first to blog about it.  I wondered how much the Chief Justice knew, and so far there is no proof that she was aware of the party.  We may assume that she was aware, but that is all it is an assumption.

So let’s hold her accountable for the right reasons – her overstepping her constitutional role when she legislated from the bench.  Hold her accountable for the decision made on same-sex marriage.

Let’s knock it off with the personal attacks.  I don’t like it when liberals do it, and we should be better than that as well.

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to receive stimulating conservative Christian commentary in your inbox.

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
3 comments
  1. Poll of Iowa voters found that 55 percent were more likely to vote NO on retention of the Supreme Court because of the court’s decision imposing so-called homosexual “marriage” on the state. Pretty strong.

    But…

    Same poll found that SEVENTY-ONE percent of voters said they were more likely to vote NO on retention when reminded of the underage drinking party at Ternus’ home. Obviously, voters strongly believe it is a valid and serious issue, polling higher than any issue other in moving them toward a NO vote on retention.

Comments are closed.

You May Also Like

Sam Clovis: There Is Nothing Conservative About The Common Core

U.S. Senate Candidate Sam Clovis speaks out against the Common Core State Standards that represents centralization of education at the Federal level.

Mike Huckabee Joins Iowa GOP to Celebrate Life

2008 Republican Iowa Caucus winner and Fox News host Mike Huckabee will join the Republican Party of Iowa on February 23 for their “Celebrate Life” event.

National Taxpayers Union Rates Congress

By Jennifer Crull Every month many Americans have to review their income…

Mississippi River Dredge Project Means a Boost for Iowa Farmers

Joni Ernst: This project will put more money in the pockets of our hardworking farmers and will help make Iowa’s agriculture products more competitive in the global market.