ADVERTISEMENT

Four Iowa voters filed suit yesterday in federal court to stop the dominating influence of attorneys over the system for selecting state judges in Iowa, arguing that this influence denies ordinary Iowa voters an equal voice in selecting justices for the Iowa Supreme Court.

Three Iowa Supreme Court justices lost their retention elections this November. Under Iowa law, nominations for their replacements are made by the fifteen member State Judicial Nominating Commission. Only candidates nominated by the Commission may be appointed by the Governor. Since all nominees allowed to move forward by the Commission may be opposed to the Governor, the Commission, and not the people, has complete control over who becomes a judge in Iowa. Seven of Commission members are selected in elections in which only attorneys can vote. The current system thus guarantees lawyers a far greater say than ordinary citizens in Iowa in selecting judges who have great power and control over the lives of regular citizens.

The suit asks the court to stop the elected members of the Commission from participating in the nomination process and to stop any future election restricted to attorneys. The Commission can go forward and make its nominations without attorney member participation. According to attorney James Bopp, Jr., lead counsel for the plaintiffs, the Iowa system “gives attorneys a stranglehold on the judiciary. Lawyers in Iowa have enormous influence over who the state judges are, while the ordinary voter is denied the right to an equal voice.”

The case is Carlson, et al. v. Cady, et al. The complaint and memorandum supporting the motion for a temporary restraining order are available in PDF format online at the James Madison Center’s website, www.jamesmadisoncenter.org.

2 comments
  1. I would hope that lawyers would be the ones picking judges, they have experience in the judical system and would know what to look for. There’s a reason we let experts have more authority in their field of interest. It’s the same reason we don’t have people vote for safety regulations of airplanes — leave it to the experts.

    1. Yes, the liberal lawyers controlled by the Iowa Bar Association. Please, like there is no inherent conflict of interest there. We don’t even have that at the Federal level.

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

Reynolds Says Iowa’s Strategy Dealing With COVID-19 Is Shifting

Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds said with additional data the state is changing it’s strategy in how it approaches COVID-19 to containing and managing.

Loebsack Announces He Will Not Seek Reelection in 2020

U.S. Rep. Dave Loebsack, D-Iowa, announced he would retire at the end of his seventh term and not run for re-election in Iowa’s 2nd Congressional District.

Baltimore Removed As Iowa House Judiciary Chair Following OWI Arrest

Shane Vander Hart: Iowa House Speaker Linda Upmeyer made the right decision removing State Representative Chip Baltimore as the House Judiciary Committee Chair following his OWI arrest. Baltimore should also resign from the House following this session.

Loras College Poll: Joni Ernst Clear Frontrunner in Iowa GOP U.S. Senate Primary

A Loras College Poll released today shows that State Senator Joni Ernst…