You would think this story would get more attention than what it is currently getting

The Pentagon’s investigation of defense and intelligence employees who downloaded child pornography is being criticized in Congress after the Department of Defense acknowledged that its investigators failed to check thoroughly whether its employees were on a list of suspected porn viewers.

In 2006, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, which conducts Internet pornography investigations, produced a list of 5,200 Pentagon employees suspected of viewing child pornography and asked the Pentagon to review it. But the Pentagon checked only about two-thirds of the names, unearthing roughly 300 defense and intelligence employees who allegedly had viewed child pornography on their work or home computers.

The defense investigators failed to check an additional 1,700 names on the list, defense officials have revealed in correspondence with Senator Charles Grassley, Republican of Iowa.

Downloading child pornography is a federal crime, punishable by prison sentences of five to 20 years. But members of Congress and other officials say it raises additional concerns when such materials are accessed by employees with high-level security classifications, because it leaves them vulnerable to blackmail.

This is getting scant coverage…. why?  5,200 people at the Pentagon suspected of viewing child pornography and they don’t follow through with everybody on this list when they investigated?

Doesn’t this make your blood boil?  Do we not care that there may be people still on Uncle Sam’s payroll – in the Pentagon who participate in this criminal act… and worse yet do it on the taxpayer dime.  Worse still who knows what security clearance they have and what kind of a national security risk they pose.

I criticized Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) earlier, but I’ll give him kudos for trying to raise the alarm here.  He was on CNN with Anderson Cooper, you can watch below:

Then there is the issue of why it is that many federal employees are engaged in this type of behavior. By the way, I’m not blaming the Obama administration for the initial problem – it started under the Bush administration. I’m just curious why they are being so lax on investigating this.  The Pentagon promises a full investigation, but actions speak louder than words.

4 comments
  1. For example, in child pornography cases, the victims depicted in the images need to be positively identified as minors by law enforcement officials for charges to be brought.

    So, they dumped over five thousand investigations– thousands of which are past being chargeable offenses– into the Pentagon’s lap, without doing the investigation to prove if the stuff downloaded was even illegal?

    If they only found 300 SUSPECTED cases out of checking two-thirds of five thousand, that means that less than one in a thousand were possible child porn by one of their employees, that means that ICE just dumped a ton of garbage in their laps– I’d have delayed the older stuff, too. Even if it went as high as one in a hundred, that’s a ridiculous rate of false positives and a big red flag that either someone was trying for big numbers, or didn’t want to pay to do the rest of the investigation but did want credit.

  2. For example, in child pornography cases, the victims depicted in the images need to be positively identified as minors by law enforcement officials for charges to be brought.

    So, they dumped over five thousand investigations– thousands of which are past being chargeable offenses– into the Pentagon’s lap, without doing the investigation to prove if the stuff downloaded was even illegal?

    If they only found 300 SUSPECTED cases out of checking two-thirds of five thousand, that means that less than one in a thousand were possible child porn by one of their employees, that means that ICE just dumped a ton of garbage in their laps– I’d have delayed the older stuff, too. Even if it went as high as one in a hundred, that’s a ridiculous rate of false positives and a big red flag that either someone was trying for big numbers, or didn’t want to pay to do the rest of the investigation but did want credit.

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

George Washington v. Barack Obama, the Jury is Out

The life that counts must toil and fight, Must hate the wrong…

Martha Roby: I Speak For The Unborn Who Cannot Speak For Themselves

Congresswoman Martha Roby (R-AL): “We are here to speak up for those who can’t speak up for themselves. We are here to defend those who cannot defend themselves.”

ACORN Suspending Operations

It’s been a really bad week for ACORN. The Washington Times reports:…

A Pre-State of the Union Quandary – Do I Have to Watch?

Yes, tonight is the fated State of the Union Address, and just thinking about the items on this administration’s agenda make me feel like my head is going to explode. Some topics to watch for in tonight’s address include… *The Economy *The immigration system *Regulation of carbon emissions *Wall Street regulations *The recent Supreme Court decision *The ailing Healthcare Bill *Foreign Affairs and Terrorist threats *Government reform