Attorney General Eric Holder announced that the U.S. Department of Justice will no longer defend DOMA, Holder said in his statement:

After careful consideration, including a review of my recommendation, the President has concluded that given a number of factors, including a documented history of discrimination, classifications based on sexual orientation should be subject to a more heightened standard of scrutiny. The President has also concluded that Section 3 of DOMA, as applied to legally married same-sex couples, fails to meet that standard and is therefore unconstitutional. Given that conclusion, the President has instructed the Department not to defend the statute in such cases. I fully concur with the President’s determination.

I’m not sure I can say anything that I haven’t already said before.  It’s not a surprise.  President Barack Obama’s “personal belief” that marriage is between one man and one woman that he expressed during 2008 was a sham.  He thinks when life begins was above his pay grade, but evidently has no problem deciding on the definition of marriage.

Since he believes section 3 of DOMA applied to legally married same-sex couples, what does he think about a federal judge’s ruling that California’s constitution was unconstitutional?  Hmm….

You May Also Like

Barring Additional Evidence, the Senate Should Vote on Kavanaugh

While Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser has now been identified, it is a he said/she said scenario with no corroborating evidence that should delay a vote.

Five Items of Interest: Gingrich’s Vacation, NOH8, Obama vs. Indiana, Jobs?, & Palin’s History Lesson

Here is this week’s round of miscellaneous items gathered from around the…

Ten Specific Problems with the U.N Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

By Michael Farris The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with…

The Behavioral Economic Case Against Keynesianism

Recently, I wrote a post on behavioral economics, and I discussed the…