ADVERTISEMENT

imagePOLITICO had an interesting article by Alexander Burns entitled “Right grapples with social ‘truce.’”  He writes, “Social conservative leaders in the Republican Party are coming to grips with a new reality ahead of the 2012 presidential primary: It’s not all about them.”

Mr. Burns, with all due respect, most social conservatives have never thought it was all about them.  In fact I have yet to meet a social conservative who isn’t concerned about fiscal issues.  However we understand that social issues impact fiscal issues.  We also understand that while the economy may drive the 2012 elections, we want a candidate who is not squishy on social issues.  Now I have met fiscal conservatives and social moderates who do believe and have always believed it was all about them.

Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels comment that we need “a truce” on social issues was tragic.  Many interpret that to mean surrender and/or apathetic neglect.  That isn’t acceptable, but leading with the economy (as well as energy policy with $5.00/gallon gas prices looming) is palatable.  We feel the pinch as well.

So there is no truce.  While we expect economy to be the focus candidates who believe they can write off social issues will not get a pass.  We want a Reagan conservative, not a milquetoast.

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to receive stimulating conservative Christian commentary in your inbox.

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
4 comments
  1. A Reagan conservative? A divorcee who didn’t get along with his kids? A candidate whose wife is an outspoken supporter of stem cell research? A governor who signed pro-abortion legislation?

  2. I expect that the Republican nominee can walk and chew gum at the same time. If not, then he/she should not be our nominee.

    While the fiscal issues should be front and center, the social issues need to be addressed as well. Afterall, do we want tax payers funding abortion? No. Do we want Obama deciding which laws he wants to abide by? No-we want the government to uphold DOMA.

Comments are closed.

You May Also Like

Obama’s Tyranny By Rule

Shane Vander Hart: President Barack Obama will allow boys in girls’ locker rooms at school, force hospitals to provide abortions, and change who gets overtime by rule, not law.

Poll: Millennial Women Are Largely Disinterested in Midterm Elections

Shane Vander Hart: A new poll of Millennial women show they are politically disengaged. What this means for the blue wave some are predicting remains to be seen.

Do Your Patriotic Duty, Report Health Care Dissenters!

The White House is interested in those who don’t agree with the…

Political PvP: Budgeting

In a series on Political PvP (Player vs. Player), Jason Schmidt looks at the difference between budgeting in the private sector versus the public sector.