Pawlenty is currently on his ‘Road to Results’ tour of Iowa.  It was at his first stop of the tour, in Coralville, Iowa, where I met up with the Governor.  It was here, where several statements by the Governor lead me to conclude that he is no leader…he is a MIS-leader.

Claim: Today, Pawlenty again stated that his campaign had raised the second most in fundraising, second only to Mitt Romney.

Fact: Pawlenty came in third behind both Romney and Paul.

The Details: Pawlenty’s official FEC reportshows the following:

Yes, you in the back...what? You're saying 4.3M is not more than 4.5M...are you sure?
6. Cash on Hand at BEGINNING of the Reporting Period  116,646.51
7. Total Receipts This Period  4,335,694.99
8. Subtotal (6 + 7)  4,452,341.50

 

Compare that with Paul’s official FEC report showing the following:

6. Cash on Hand at BEGINNING of the Reporting Period0.00
7. Total Receipts This Period4518947.59
8. Subtotal (6 + 7)4518947.59

 

The reports make clear that Pawlenty’s second quarter fundraising total was 4.3M while Dr. Paul’s second quarter fundraising total was 4.5M dollars.

When Pawlenty stated he raised the second most, I pointed out that Paul had raised more than him, he said, I think our revised figures showed that we raised 4.5M, so we tied.

Not satisfied, I contacted the Pawlenty campaign for comment, of which they had two. The following statements are from Alex Conant Pawlenty’s national communications director:

First comment: “Since most media are comparing what the campaigns have raised since they announced, the 4.5m number is most accurate.”

Fact: Yes and no, since Pawlenty was the only candidate to announce the formation of an exploratory committee prior to the start of the second quarter, it could be said that both claims are true, First that media was comparing campaigns since they announced and second that the media was reporting second quarter numbers only and inadvertently including Pawlenty’s first quarter fundraising at the MIS-Leading of the campaign.  With most media reports sprinkled with ‘second quarter’, I think this is a bit MIS-Leading for the Pawlenty campaign to release a press release stating 4.5M for stories to be written with that figure prior to the release of the FEC report showing the second quarter 4.3M figure.

Also Nick Ayers, Pawlenty Campaign Manager had this to say to supporters via email:  ” Today’s FEC disclosure reports make this point clearly. We came in second place in Republican presidential fundraising.”  Since the FEC disclosure reports he was referring to were of the second quarter, it is clearly MIS-Leading to state they came in second in fundraising.

Well then I at least TIED Paul...right? 4.3M = 4.5M right?

Second Comment: “We tied with Paul for 2nd, right?”

Fact: First of all, Pawlenty and staff are not going around announcing that they tied for second, they are claiming that they came in second.  In fact Nick Ayers’s email went on to say: “The reality is that Michele Bachmann, Ron Paul, Jon Huntsman, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, Herman Cain, and Mitt Romney all built infrastructures as early as the Governor, and began organizing, yet only one raised more money and most raised far less.”  So they are clearly sending the message that the only candidate to raise more was Romney, all others including Dr. Paul raised less.  Here we get to debunk two MIS-Leading statements in one.

First that ‘Bachman, Paul, Huntsman, Gingrich, Santorum, Cain and Romney all built infrastructures as early as the governor”

Fact: In order to begin fundraising for a possible presidential run, you must form a exploratory committee.  Pawlenty was the earliest to form a committee, clear back on March 21st.  Next was Romney and Santorum at  3 weeks later, Paul at 5 weeks later, Cain at 6 weeks later, Bachman 12 weeks later and finally Huntsman 13 weeks later.  Clearly to say that they all started as early is MIS-Leading.

Second that they were tied with Paul.

Fact: First, there is a discrepancy between spokesmen as Mr. Conant says they were tied, while Ayers says they had more than Paul.  Both are MIS-Leading. In the second quarter Dr. Paul raised 4518947.59, whild Pawlenty raised 4,335,694.99.  Dr. Paul raised nearly 200K more than Pawlenty in the second quarter.  200K may seam like small potatoes, but tell that to Rick Santorum.   The best case scenario, to be considered tied with Paul requires including Pawlenty’s first quarter, AND requires Pawlenty to round UP, while Paul rounds DOWN.  You may stretch the numbers and consider them tied, but clearly to indicate that Pawlenty raised more than Paul as the campaign is doing is very MIS-Leading.  You may think arguing over a few hundred thousand is nit-picking, but when we are looking for someone to control our 3.6 trillion dollar budget, we don’t want someone who is going to be MIS-Leading with fuzzy math.

OH, you're good! There is no getting anything past you, is there? You must have passed the second grade.

While at the event, Pawlenty was a MIS-Leader regarding several more issues, but this article is long enough as is.  Check back soon as I write about two more ways Pawlenty is MIS-Leading on the campaign trail, Taxes and the Constitution.

 

11 comments
  1. Nice catch, brother. You won’t find any such misleading information coming from the Paul campaign, I’ll wager.

  2. I just checked the FEC website myself and have to concur with the author.  Pawlenty is misleading people.  Additionally, some more information can be brought to light about the comparison in fundraising.  85+% of Pawlenty’s contributions came from fat cats donating more than $2000 each.  Paul comes in at 14% of donations greater than $2000 each.  That shows that Pawlenty is only supported by the rich.  Also, Pawlenty has already burned through $2.47 million of what has been donated to him.  Paul has only spent $1.55 million of his haul.  This clearly shows that Paul is being more responsible with his money.

    So, you have to ask yourself, do I want to support Pawlenty, who is clearly out of touch with the common man, or go with Paul who has strong grass roots support?  Do you want to support Pawlenty who is less frugal, or support Paul who is careful about what he spends?

    I also urge people to look at a comparison between Romney and Paul.  Romney also gets his money from fat cats and has spent 3.6 times as much as Paul and has also been slipping in the polls.

  3. I also think a good chunk of Pawlenty’s money is for the General Election (so – big donors maxed out at $5000 … $2500 for primaries and $2500 for general).  I’m not sure how to get the actual total though.

    1. Thanks, I was especially proud of the captions, I thought they fit very well.  

  4. i say you get caught in a lie you are out.. no second chances. We the People.. dont want you

  5. i say you get caught in a lie you are out.. no second chances. We the People.. dont want you

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

Jim DeMint in Des Moines: Do We Have the Courage to Live Free?

Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC) spoke after a great red meat (no really,…

Ben Carson Nominated to Head Housing and Urban Development

President-elect Donald Trump announced his intent to nominate Dr. Ben Carson to serve as U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

Iowa GOP Night of the Rising Stars

I had the chance to attend the Night of the Rising Stars…

Muslims… The Final Frontier

Silly me I thought NASA’s mission was to go into space, but…