• Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Caffeinated Thoughts Gear
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • The Caffeinated Thoughts Podcast

Caffeinated Thoughts

Stimulating Christian Conservative News & Commentary

Social Media Management
  • Culture
  • Current Events
    • Sports
  • Education
  • Faith & Theology
  • Iowa News & Politics
  • State News & Politics
    • California News & Politics
    • Colorado News & Politics
    • Illinois News & Politics
    • Kansas News & Politics
    • Missouri News & Politics
    • Nebraska News & Politics
    • New Hampshire News & Politics
    • Ohio News & Politics
    • South Carolina News & Politics
    • South Dakota News & Politics
    • Wisconsin News & Politics
  • U.S. News & Politics
    • Election Central

South Carolina Educrats Putting Children at Risk

August 22, 2011 By Shane Vander Hart



imageI was alerted about a situation in South Carolina where the state educational bureaucracy have ignored parents and have put two different children’s wellbeing at risk.  At the crux of the matter is standardized testing.  Evidently children must be tested in South Carolina no matter what parents or even the medical community has to say.  Grumpy Educators reports:

Gretchen Herrera’s son has a complicated medical condition, which is exacerbated by testing regimes. His medical team recommended he not be tested as it puts his health at risk. The request was denied, Mrs. Herrera allowed testing, and after the first day of testing, his health was negatively impacted. If a parent had neglected the health and well-being of their child, they’d find themselves in court with the government stepping in to protect the child. In this case, the government is endangering the child and ignoring the parent….

…Sharon Johnson’s son has a complicated medical condition, and was treated in "an outpatient day treatment to stabilize children with severe emotional and/or behavioral problems. Among other criteria, admitted children must have demonstrated behavior serious enough to jeopardize the safety of others." Upon completion of treatment, he enrolled in public school and slated for standardized testing. In spite of a written medical recommendation that "he was mentally unable to be tested", South Carolina insists if a child can attend school, the child can be tested.

I find it amazing that educrats in South Carolina think they know better than the parents and medical professionals what is in the best interest of these children.  Parents, and parents alone, should be able to make these decisions for their children.  I doubt that South Carolina is the only place where parental rights are being trampled on.  If you know of other instances in your state, please share here.

  • About
  • Latest Posts

Shane Vander Hart

Editor & Founder at Caffeinated Thoughts
Shane Vander Hart is the founder and editor-in-chief of Caffeinated Thoughts.  He is also the President of 4:15 Communications, LLC, a social media & communications consulting/management firm.  Prior to this Shane spent 20 years in youth ministry serving in church, parachurch, and school settings.  He has also served as an interim pastor and is a sought after speaker and pulpit fill-in.  Shane has been married to his wife Cheryl since 1993 and they have three kids.  Shane and his family reside near Des Moines, IA.

Latest posts by Shane Vander Hart (see all)

  • The DNC Says They Are Suing Russia and the Trump Campaign - April 20, 2018
  • Are Transgender Marines and Sailors Causing Unit Cohesion Problems? - April 20, 2018
  • The Top 15 Most Popular Governors Are Republican - April 19, 2018

Related

Filed Under: Education Tagged With: Parental Rights, parental sovereignty, South Carolina Department of Education, standardized testing, welfare of children

About Shane Vander Hart

Shane Vander Hart is the founder and editor-in-chief of Caffeinated Thoughts.  He is also the President of 4:15 Communications, LLC, a social media & communications consulting/management firm.  Prior to this Shane spent 20 years in youth ministry serving in church, parachurch, and school settings.  He has also served as an interim pastor and is a sought after speaker and pulpit fill-in.  Shane has been married to his wife Cheryl since 1993 and they have three kids.  Shane and his family reside near Des Moines, IA.

Comments

  1. SJ says

    August 23, 2011 at 3:52 am

    That’s a shame.  Now, if a child is perfectly healthy, I don’t think that a parent–under normal circumstances, at least–should be able to say that they simply don’t want their kids to take standardized tests (that are paid for by the state), without having an excellent reason.  Well, the parents of both kids mentioned in your article did have excellent reasons.  For the state to trample on their rights is obscene.  I smell a lawsuit–or at least I hope I do!   😛

  2. SJ says

    August 23, 2011 at 3:52 am

    That’s a shame.  Now, if a child is perfectly healthy, I don’t think that a parent–under normal circumstances, at least–should be able to say that they simply don’t want their kids to take standardized tests (that are paid for by the state), without having an excellent reason.  Well, the parents of both kids mentioned in your article did have excellent reasons.  For the state to trample on their rights is obscene.  I smell a lawsuit–or at least I hope I do!   😛

    • OptOut says

      August 23, 2011 at 4:20 pm

      Who should decide which reasons are excellent?  And where does the state get the money to pay for these tests?  We are all paying for these tests, in more ways than one.

      Yes, it is a very obvious shame in these two unique cases, but parents should be able to decide whether or not their children participate in the circus of high stakes testing and “teaching to the test” philosophy that led Atlanta educators to change answers on the tests.

      • SJ says

        August 24, 2011 at 4:26 am

        Who should decide which reasons are excellent?

        Paris Hilton?  No, seriously–that’s a good question.  🙂

        Yes, it is a very obvious shame in these two unique cases, but parents should be able to decide whether or not their children participate in the circus of high stakes testing and ‘teaching to the test’ philosophy that led Atlanta educators to change answers on the tests.

        First off, I think standardized tests are vastly overrated.  And I also despise the “teaching to the test” philosophy that many schools/teachers have.  But I think taking a test once a year isn’t necessarily a bad idea.  When I was younger, we had the Iowa Test of Basic Skills.  (And we never “studied’ for the test beforehand either.)  However, if schools nowadays are making kids take standardized tests several times a year and waste time studying for them, then I would consider that excessive, and, yes, I think parents should be able to opt out.

      • OptOut says

        August 24, 2011 at 2:42 pm

        Agreed.  The name of the game has changed since I was younger.  There are weeks of state tests each year, and some states have district assessments as well, 3-4 times a year.  Some may say “Come on, it’s just a test.  What’s the big deal?”  But what they do not realize is that schools/teachers have to be preoccupied all year long with preparing for the tests.  My daughter actually had a course in 3rd grade called “test taking skills”.  The students become a number, a statistic, instead of an individual. 

        What we need is individual observation/assessments of a child’s growth from the beginning of the year to the end of the year.  Ask a special ed teacher how he shows growth for a student.  I assure you it is not from the state test results. 

      • SJ says

        August 25, 2011 at 11:00 am

        There are weeks of state tests each year.

        Weeks?  Are you serious?   And sometimes in addition to multiple district assessments?  How do the kids have time to learn anything substantive when they’re so busy taking tests?  And how can one prep 3rd-graders on “test-taking skills”???  

        That’s nuts.  Yes, parents should definitely be able to opt out of that madness, with no more excuse than “the dog ate my no. 2 pencil.”  😉  Furthermore, it sounds like the kids in special ed might be learning more than the other kids!

  3. Sandra Brevard says

    August 24, 2011 at 3:06 am

    The so-called “new generation” of standardized testing begins will begin with preschoolers and will include more than one test, but several standardized tests along the way. Then the data will be stored in a state longitudinal database, from preschool to the first year of college. Under a regulation change proposed by the Sec. of Education, parent consent for accessing data needed by other government agencies and research organizations will not be necessary. Who pays? Who benefits?

  4. Sandra Brevard says

    August 24, 2011 at 1:42 pm

    There seems to be a similar case in North Carolina. I’m trying to obtain details.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Connect With Us!

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Instagram
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe to Our Podcast

Apple PodcastsBlubrry Google Play Music Podbean Soundcloud Stitcher

  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • CT Gear
  • Donate
  • Send a News Tip
  • The Caffeinated Thoughts Briefing

Top Posts & Pages

  • No Mass Shootings: The Myth of Australia's Gun Control Policy
  • Top Ten Reasons Why Students Need More Literature (Not Less)
  • Dietrich Bonhoeffer: Cheap Grace vs. Costly Grace
  • Are Transgender Marines and Sailors Causing Unit Cohesion Problems?
  • Elon Musk – Production Hell or Party Balloons? Pick One.
  • The Top 15 Most Popular Governors Are Republican
  • The DNC Says They Are Suing Russia and the Trump Campaign
  • How Does the Bible Define the Word Nation? (It Is Not What You Think)
  • Update: Reynolds Signs Bill Changing Iowa's Statewide Assessment Developer
  • Seven Ways Christians Should Respond to Persecution

Recent Posts

  • Elon Musk – Production Hell or Party Balloons? Pick One.
  • The DNC Says They Are Suing Russia and the Trump Campaign
  • Are Transgender Marines and Sailors Causing Unit Cohesion Problems?
  • The Top 15 Most Popular Governors Are Republican
  • Iowa Ethics & Campaign Disclosure Board Sides With Pate, Rebuts AP Story
  • The Expendables: There’s More to Life than Death
  • Ernst Calls For A Fix to Dysfunctional Budget Process
  • Update: Reynolds Signs Bill Changing Iowa’s Statewide Assessment Developer

© Copyright 2018 Caffeinated Thoughts · All Rights Reserved · Hosted by 4:15 Communications, LLC.