My jaw about dropped when I read Jason Clayworth’s piece yesterday in The Des Moines Register that discussed Secretary of State Matt Schultz’ desire to be able to reject offensive business names that are submitted to the Secretary of State’s office.  He wrote:

“Squirrel Piss LLC” is causing a warm stream of controversy at the Capitol.

Some say the proposed business name is offensive as are others that have successfully incorporated, such as “Fat Bastard Enterprises” and “Fartless.”

Now, Secretary of State Matt Schultz — a man who has a picture of Jesus Christ hanging from his office wall at the Capitol — wants lawmakers to give him the right to turn down potentially offensive names.

“As far as I’m concerned, it’s up to the Legislature. We just want to get the conversation started and let people know that these kinds of things come to our office,” Schultz said. (emphasis mine)

The only reason I can think of as to why Clayworth would even mention the art that is supposed to be representative of Christ is that he thinks it is just as offensive as “Squirrel Piss LLC”  (I’m not a fan of such art for reasons better suited for discussion on Caffeinated Theology).  I want to be crystal clear on this.  I’m not defending such legislation, while I believe it is unseemly I’m not sure that the state needs have the power to reject or decline such names.  Such power could end up being misused or the tables could be turned if somebody like Clayworth were the Secretary of State.  So I agree with State Senator Jeff Danielson (D-Cedar Falls) who believes that the evolution of the free market will weed out company names like that.

What disturbs me is that Clayworth’s article is being passed off as actual hard news.  It was a snarky comment that was inherently biased and it had no place in the article.  If he were writing an opinion piece that would be quite different, but that wasn’t what he was trying to do.

I give a “thistle” to Clayworth and to his editor for letting it stand.

Enhanced by Zemanta
1 comment
  1. Fair paraphrase: proposed rule is dumb, announcing that the guy has a picture on his wall is even dumber?

    (Barring it being a picture of, say, some Soviet that was involved in one of those erase-from-the-picture things…and then it probably wouldn’t be mentioned.)

    It fits their narrative, though, so of course they had it.

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

Does Brad Anderson Understand the Iowa Secretary of State’s Job?

Brad Anderson keeps attacking Iowa Secretary of State Matt Schultz’s work toward a voter ID and ending voter fraud. Does he even understand the job?

Des Moines City Council Moves a Step Closer to a Racial Profiling Ban

The Des Moines City Council approved the first consideration of a ban on racial profiling by police by a 7 to 0 vote, they will consider it again on June 22.

Where Does Greenfield Stand on Stacking the Supreme Court?

On the question of whether she supports expanding the Supreme Court beyond nine justices, Theresa Greenfield went from a definite no to having no opinion.

Branstad Vetoes One-Time Supplemental Aid for Iowa Schools

Governor Terry Branstad (R-Iowa) vetoed $55.7 million in one-time money that was earmarked for supplemental payments for Iowa’s K-12 public schools.