Compromise can be a great asset in discussions of pertinent ideas such as religion or politics.  The history of the US has shown our people having a great ability to compromise in order to maintain order and proceed forward in an orderly manner.  One can look at the politics of this nation and see where it has happened, but compromise is predicated on the ability and willingness of the two parties to reach a common middle ground.    When that ceases to be possible confrontation can ensue.  Such confrontation arose in 1860 over States Rights and Slavery and led to the American Civil War, and cost the US 620,000 dead.

We seem to be reaching a point where we are losing the ability to compromise between Left and Right, Democrat and Republican in the US.  Now I am not proposing another Civil War could be in the making.  I don’t know.  I do see a disturbing tendency in society for both sides to talk at each other, but not talk to each other.  There is no communication, only rhetoric, and the rhetoric has become more violent in its nature and disturbing.  It has been more hideous with comments by liberal pundits Ed Shulz and Bill Maher, but even conservative Rush Limbaugh has made the mistakes of sinking to the level of the liberals.

We have lost the ability to find commonalities between our positions and work towards solutions.  For example, in the late 1980’s when I was a college student I had friends who were liberals of the day.  They were pro-choice and I was pro-life, but we could both agree that unwanted pregnancies needed to be reduced.  We could agree that abortions were the worst possible form of birth-control, and that better methods should be desired.  My friends who were pro-choice still wanted abortions available if desired and I did not, but I could also see that if unwanted pregnancies were reduced that the numbers of abortions would be dramatically reduced….the fewer abortions, the less outrage over the numbers of unborn babies killed, and the less of a tragedy there would be.  If both sides worked together and we compromised perhaps in theory abortion would be on the books and used ocassionally, but the problem of 1.5 million abortions per year would also disappear.  I don’t see discussions like my friends and I formerly having happening anymore.

This leads to the question of who is blame?  In most human relationships both sides tend to be at fault to some degree.  Perhaps in today’s world the conservatives are also at fault, but I don’t see it.

Essentially the modern Republican party and conservative movement have either stayed where they were or moved somewhat to the left.  They haven’t become reactionary trying to eliminate all social spending.  They haven’t tried to move the voting age back to twenty-one.  They have actually supported more social spending and more health care “reform.” Many conservatives have supported measures to combat violence against homosexuals or homosexual unions, but marriage?  The liberals, on the other hand, have moved towards a more and more Marxist position.  The election of Barack Obama and his Marxist war on the upper class have driven the left beyond being left to being socialist.  The modern democrats are no longer for democracy, but for statism or a form of facism.  This is making compromise harder.  It is harder to compromise when the other side keeps shifting further away and when they harden their rhetoric.  It is harder to compromise when the sides lose the ability to respect and work with each other.  It is harder to work together when the one side demands compromise from the other, but refuses to compromise themselves.  This is what has happened between left and right in the US.

Where do we go?  Who knows?  Race wars?  Civil Wars?  Civil unrest?

Who knows…..

  1. The right has nearly compromised the country away. Compromise on the things God has made clear in His Word is sinful. No politician can take away the guilt for that. Every unborn child is worthy of protection, no stragglers. Can you imagine the Marine slogan “Leave only a few behind”?

  2. It is so sad when a family must turn to public assistance when they are unable to provide for their families with their own income and polititians make it nearly impossible to access food stamps, extended unemployment insurance, medicaid, reduced or free school lunches, earned income credits, and things like subsudized housing. All politicians must behave in a christian way and take care of the  less fortunate just as Jesus Christ did.

  3.  you clearly haven’t taken a political science class. If you did, you would know that there are far more Sam Nunns or John Breauxs of the world (conservative democrats) than there are Jacob Javits or Ed Brookes (liberal republicans).

    1. You mean the six hours I have from the University of Nebraska and the twenty-four I have in my minor in Political Science from Nebraska Wesleyan.  Nope, I never took a Political Science course.

      As far as the conservative or blue dog democrats are concerned, there are a lot of Democrats in the South that remain in the party despite the shift towards being Republican that occurred since 1964.  In my home state, Nebraska, Democrats often have to move right to win the governorship or senatorshp.

      1. If your so smart, why are you working at Sam’s club part tame and using goverment services for your family to survive?

      2. Good point.  Please forgive my prideful previous comment; my minor in college was in Political science. Hard work, education, and intelligence don’t always protect you from a lay off, taking the wrong job, a bad economy, personality conflicts. I’m just grateful right now to have a job of any kind.

  4. After googling Keith, I find many of his articles belittling non whites, anyone who is not a very conservative republican, ridgid in his opinion, unwilling to listen to veiws that do not match his exactly, and most surprising a large amont of time spent on facebook games when he could be out looking for a job. Loosing a job because of personality conflicts says a lot about a person and their ability to work with others of opposing views. News flash.. prospective employers will google you and if you are a prospective problem because of your published views will not take the legal risk of hiring you.

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

Bill Targeting California’s Christian Colleges Changed After Intense Opposition

A California state senator changed language in a bill that would have removed conscience protections from California’s private religious institutions.

Rick Perry Talks Red State Polices, Immigration at Altoona Business Roundtable

Texas Governor Rick Perry discussed immigration, the border crisis, and economic red state policies at a business roundtable meeting in Altoona, IA.

A Hyper-Partisan Fed Chair?

Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen’s recent speeches and an upcoming meeting lends credibility to the argument that she is no more than a political hack.

Free Speech in California