Fiscal Cliff
The big question right now is whether about Republicans should agree to tax increases in order to avoid what scold the fiscal cliff. From a conservative perspective, we don’t need more taxes, we need a fundamental reduction in government spending and a plan to reform entitlements. However, Democrats insist that any plans include tax increases. Sage advice suggests that a combination of spending cuts and tax increases as a compromise could work in theory.

However, the problem in reality is that time and time again the Democrats are shown that they’re not serious about bringing down spending. What’s happened in the past thirty years on several occasions is we’ve had these agreements to cut spending and raise taxes between Republicans and Democrats. That the spending have not been followed through on in the long term but the taxes have gone up.

Spending cuts as part of these big deals far-off promises that politicians will fulfill in the great by-and-by. The popular stratagem when announcing a trillion dollar spending cut over ten years is to put $800 billion in the ninth and tenth year, effectively leaving the tough choice to someone else or for a time after voters have forgotten about the agreement.  Because of this, politicians invariably decide to back away from those commitments. Meanwhile, the tax increases are automatic and statutory and require special effort in order to reverse. If Republicans are expecting anything different from this president and congressional Democrats, they really are ignoring a history of the Democratic Party’s tactic on these issues.

If there is to be any sort of grand deal to reduce the deficit and we have to see a more serious effort. For one thing, we should see government departments agencies and offices actually close the rather than cuts coming from hiring freezes and waiting for attrition to technically reduce the government payroll. , We should see serious reforms of entitlements.

If neither of these elements are present, then any sort of grand bargain is really just a grand scam. It is foolish to expect the Congress will abide by agreements to cut spending when they never have in the past, and there’s no sign that any efforts have been made to make a deal that’s structurally different from all the failed deficit reduction packs of the past.

1 comment
  1. In the day (starting to sound like grandpa, because I am!), we used to cry about government spending $75 for hammers. We must be spending millions on hammers today. If someone would publish a list of where the trillions of dollars are going, there might just be an out-cry.

    On another thought, I’m wondering how we are even tracking that much money when we all know that government computers don’t communicate together well, if at all!!!

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

Trump’s Former Campaign Chairman Turns Himself in to FBI

Former Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort and his associate Rick Gates were indicted on 12 different counts including conspiracy against the United States.

A Few Bytes to Eat From Around the Country: Alabama, Missouri, Arkansas

Video clips and news stories from around the country that might have…

Obama And Unemployment: A Conflict of Interest

Why does high unemployment persist under Obama? There are several answers to…

(Video) Ernst Defends ICE on U.S. Senate Floor

U.S. Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) spoke on the U.S. Senate floor in support of a resolution denouncing calls for the elimination of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).