Governor Branstad, Lt. Governor Reynolds and Daniel McConchie

photoIowa Governor Terry Branstad said in his opening remarks to the prolife rally at the Iowa Statehouse that he believes that “life is very precious.”  He said the right to life has been a principle since American has emerged as a free nation and that  “We must never forget that.”  And this is the message that prolife activists hoped to send to legislators at the Iowa Statehouse for the rally yesterday afternoon.

The Rally for Life was co-sponsored by several pro-life groups in Iowa: Council of Catholic Women, Iowa Catholic Conference, Lawyers for Life, Iowa Right to Life, Iowans for LIFE, Knights of Columbus, Teen PACT, The FAMiLY Leader, and Patriots for Christ.  Prior to the rally, prolife activists received training on grassroots lobbying and then had the opportunity to speak to their legislators.  During the rally the prolife legislators in the Iowa House and Senate were introduced.

Governor Branstad during his remarks also shared his optimism for the future of the prolife cause.  He said, “I have seen progress.  As we have seen the advance of medicine and that children are being able to survive outside the womb at a younger and younger age more people are getting it and understand the importance of life and that it must be protected from conception.”

Branstad touted signing a parental notification law during a previous term as Governor and most recently appointed his priest Monsignor Frank Bognanno, the pastor of Christ the King Catholic Church in Des Moines, to the Iowa Medical Board.  This is the board that approved Planned Parenthood to do telemed abortions (medication induced abortions by consulting a doctor via webcam).

Lt. Governor Kim Reynolds addressing a common argument from the left that you can’t be prolife and be pro-woman said “I believe that the prolife movement is a pro-woman movement.”

The keynote speaker was Daniel McConchie, the vice president of governmental affairs at Americans United for Life.  He thanked the Governor and Lt. Governor for coming to the event noting that “there are a lot of Governors who wouldn’t come to an event like this.”

He said that the Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood v. Casey decision while not overturning Roe v. Wade it “opened the door for states to pass new laws and regulations” like parental notification, parental consent laws, and bans on late term abortions. He said these laws have allowed us to “chip away” at abortion until we reach our ultimate goal of overturning Roe v. Wade.

He said we have also seen progress noting Gonzalez v. Carhart where the Supreme Court upheld the federal ban on partial-birth abortions.  He said in that decision the Supreme Court showed that they “were very concerned about the risks to women and risks to women’s health.  “This is the first time the court has begun to open that door even further,” McConchie said.

You can watch his full remarks below:

  1. I wonder if the Governor swore the constitutionally-required sacred oath to support the Constitution of the United States or a different extra-constitutional one to obey forty year-old immoral, lawless, unconstitutional, court opinions. In this case it can’t be both, since that document does not give law-making power to the courts, and imperatively requires this:

    “No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.”

    “No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

    Even Justice Blackmun, in the majority Roe v Wade opinion, made it clear that if the “fetus” is a person, OF COURSE they are protected by the explicit provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment.

    “The appellee and certain amici argue that the fetus is a ‘person’ within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. In support of this, they outline at length and in detail the well known facts of fetal development. If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant’s case, of course, collapses, for the fetus’ right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment.”

    — Justice Harry A. Blackmun, Roe vs. Wade, 1973

    Governor Branstad, with his assertion that life begins at conception, admits to the self-evident fact that they are a person.

    So, as the chief law enforcement officer in the state, why doesn’t he protect them?

    Isn’t waiting on the courts to do something nothing more than an excuse to do nothing?

    The equal protection of innocent human life is the primary purpose of government. It is the raison d’etre of the Governor’s office, and every other governmental office in the land.

    In summation, I consider this event to be a whole lot of empty words which accomplish absolutely nothing.

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

Personhood Bill Filed in the Iowa House

State Representative Tom Shaw (R-Laurens) filed a personhood bill, House File 138, which would make the abortion of preborn babies murder in Iowa.

Barbie with Tattoos? (Update: FYI, I’m 37)

Barbie is 50, but seems to be getting more and more trendy…

Caffeinated Book Review: Christ of the Indian Road by E. Stanley Jones

Christ of the Indian Road is a book comprised of the observations E.…

Komen Caves or Do They?

Perhaps I celebrated too soon. Planned Parenthood’s and liberal outrage at the…