Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) appears to be a double-minded man on abortion.  How he can last week be the primary sponsor for a Life at Conception bill and then the following week tell CNN in an interview that there are “thousands of exceptions” is beyond me.  The Hill reports:

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Tuesday he’s open to “thousands of exceptions” to a ban on abortion.

Paul has said he believes life begins at conception, but in an interview with CNN the Republican emphasized he is also a physician who treats each case individually.

“What I would say is that there are thousands of exceptions,” Paul told CNN host Wolf Blitzer in response to a question about exceptions to a ban.

“You know, I’m a physician and every individual case is going to be different and everything’s going to be particular to that individual case and what’s going on with that mother and the medical circumstances of that mother,” he said.

The comments come just a week after Paul, a possible White House contender in 2016, introduced the “Life at Conception Act.”

I will state for the record.  If you believe in “thousands of exceptions” you are not prolife.  If you believe that life begins at conception and believe in ANY exceptions other than perhaps the life of the mother then there is something seriously flawed with your worldview.  Some say he was taken out of context, but even so, it was not a well-thought out statement. It was politically flawed.  It made him look like a flip-flopper.

So Senator Paul likely just took a huge step backwards with Iowa’s social conservatives and this is just after I gave him props for looking like he was well-positioned for the 2016 Iowa Caucus.

Scott Conroy at Real Clear Politics quotes me about Senator Paul’s upcoming trip to Iowa:

Shane Vander Hart, editor-in-chief and founder of the Iowa-based Christian conservative news and commentary site Caffeinated Thoughts, noted that Paul’s support among Republicans in the state already extended beyond the network that his father had constructed.

“He has a great base of grassroots activists to build on, so I believe he will have an advantage coming into Iowa,” Vander Hart said. “I believe he has the ability to build a bridge with social conservatives that his dad could not quite accomplish in 2008 or 2012.”

I was given some grief over this by the new Iowa political satire site – Iowa Gif-t Shop which was linked at the top of The BeanWalker last night:

This comes days after Iowa Christian conservative blogger Shane Vander Hart said this:


Shane Vander Hart was all like:

Well yeah, kinda.  A prophet I am not.  Contrary to what the author of Iowa Gif-t shop thinks, I talked with Scott Conroy before this news broke it was just published after.  Obviously I would have said something different had this news come out before.  I also want to be clear that my comments to Conroy are not to be construed as an endorsement anyway.  I just thought he was positioned well.

But hey some people are good at snatching defeat out of the jaws of victory.  Senator Paul you shot yourself in the foot, especially since you committed the *unpardonable sin* of making me look bad.  Can’t have that :).

Rand Paul Photo Credit: Talk Radio News Services via Flickr (CC-By-NC-SA 2.0)

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to receive stimulating conservative Christian commentary in your inbox.

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
  1. I disagree with your assessment.
    Rand Paul is attempting an amazing feat. He is trying to move people from their well established perches and begin an important conversation that may change attitude toward abortion in entire country and lead to overturning Roe vs Wade.

    First, Life begins at Conception act. It does several things. It overturns Roe vs Wade legislatively by limiting federal court jurisdiction. Clarifies that life begin at conception, thus making it clear that any abortion is a homicide.

    States will decide on conditions (as they do today for other homicides) when it is considered Murder 1, Manslaughter, or (sometimes) justifiable homicide. [The conditions which move the abortion from murder or manslaughter category to justifiable homicide category are the exceptions that Rand Paul is talking about]

    There is no exceptions to Life begin at conception. Abortion is always a homicide, but depending on the circumstances it can be judged as criminal homicide or justifiable homicide. (Think of it being analogous to conjoined twins separation which may result in a death of the weaker one. It is a done as a medical necessity and it is considered a justifiable homicide)

    Imagine making a pro-abortion person to agree that abortion is a homicide. That is why they are so squeamish about Life begin at conception act, because it forces them to face what they are really supporting.

    Imagine that finally Roe vs Wade can be overturned.

    Rand is working on it, help him out.

  2. It is great that he will be here on May 10th to answer these questions. “Mr. Senator please explain your answer about thousands of exceptions.” I look forward to hearing those answers. His answers will dictate his support not only in Iowa but also from me.

      1. Good. I look forward to seeing him here in Iowa March 10th. I hope many others will attend. I’m sure he has a lot to say to the first in the nation caucus state.

  3. As for Rand Paul’s “clarification,” don’t politicians always have one in store? 🙂

    I really don’t understand why many conservatives are so quick to latch on to the next big “conservative” sensation. Their motto seems to be:

    Tell me lies,
    Tell me sweet little lies….

    Most of us would do well to meditate on Prov. 14:15a regularly: “A simple man believes everything.”

    With politicians in general, we should not assume that they are telling us the truth unless we have a good reason to believe otherwise. No, we should assume that they are not telling us the truth until we have a good reason to believe otherwise.

    Nietzsche may not have believed in God, but he sure got it right when he said: “Great minds are skeptical.”

Comments are closed.

You May Also Like

Limbaugh, Sessions, Lee & King Defend Ted Cruz’s Record on Immigration

Rush Limbaugh, Jeff Sessions, Mike Lee and Steve King refuted the claim made by Marco Rubio that he and Ted Cruz have identical positions on immigration.

Rick Santorum: Sarah Palin Schedule Expert

Rick Santorum must be an expert on Sarah Palin’s schedule, at least…

A Clarification from Ron Paul Camp on Judicial Review and Iowa’s Gay Marriage Battle

Yesterday, I wrote a post about Congressman Ron Paul’s speech & press…

Schilling Diagnosed With Cancer, Pledges to Stay In Iowa 2nd Congressional District Race

Bobby Schilling, Republican candidate in Iowa’s 2nd Congressional District, announced that he was diagnosed with cancer. He says he will stay in race.