giving to charityAmericans have long been known as a very charitable people.Ā  According to the World Giving Index, we give more to others than any other national group.Ā  As yet another national and state income-tax filing deadline has come, it is appropriate to revisit the issue raised in the 17 December 2012 issue of the Wall Street Journal ā€œShould We End the Tax Deduction for Charitable Donations?ā€Ā  As one of the articleā€™s authors stated, ā€œThe charitable deduction is unique in that itā€™s a government incentive to sacrifice on behalf of the commonweal.Ā  Unlike incentives to save for retirement or buy a home, it encourages behavior for which a taxpayer gets no direct, personal, tangible benefit.ā€

One can also make a good case that charities are much more effective at actually solving social problems and helping those in economic or social distress than are government bureaucracies whose incentive is to ā€œmanageā€ problems rather than solve them so as to perpetuate their reason for existence.Ā  As this same author argued ā€œCharities are among the most effective institutions in the country and are getting better.Ā  They operate lean and mean because they have to.Ā  They are monitored by bureaucracies, donors, their own volunteers, and the communities they serve.ā€

On the other hand, it is often suggested the Charitable Deduction be dropped because it is mostly of benefit to the well-to-do.Ā  The reason for that is that most lower-income households do not find it to their advantage to itemize under our current system.Ā  The more appropriate response to that inequity is not to drop the charitable deduction, but rather to make it a credit against oneā€™s gross income before net taxable income is determined.Ā  Everyone, not just the rich, should be treated the same for this purpose.

And without data on how much non-itemizers have been giving over the years, it is impossible to claim with confidence that charitable giving has remained constant over the years even as tax rates have changed.Ā  The most recent research on this topic by the Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy established that ā€œAmericans gave nearly $300 billion to charity in 2011, and 65 percent of Americans give each year.Ā  The schoolā€™s research also shows that the amount of tax benefits an individual receives from giving tends to affect the amount that a person gives to charity . . . and is an essential component to the creation of a caring and thriving society.ā€

Given how many are in need year in and year out, and how many more are in need since the economic downturn in our economy and the slow recovery, letā€™s make it easy for people to get credit for doing the right thing, to help others instead of themselves.Ā  Letā€™s replace the current deduction for charitable giving, which is only of use to those few who itemize, and allow everyone to take any charitable contributions ā€œoff the topā€ before determining their net income for tax purposes.

Photo credit: Rikkis Refuge via Flickr (CC By 2.0)

You May Also Like

This ANWR Legislation is Asinine

A bill was just introduced yesterday by Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CT) and…

Cheney vs. Obama: Dueling Speeches on National Security

Former Vice President Dick Cheney was scheduled to speak yesterday on National…

Don’t Bet on Santorum 2016

The Romney campaign put out a meme that Rick Santorum’s in the…

Terry Branstad Is An Excellent Choice for Ambassador to China

Shane Vander Hart gives seven reasons why President-elect Donald Trump made a good choice appointing Iowa Governor Terry Branstad to be Ambassador to China.