ADVERTISEMENT


It’s off-reported line that there is no “next in line” for 2016 as there was in 2012 when Mitt Romney was viewed as the runner up John McCain or in  2008 when John Mccain had been runner-up to George W. Bush or 1996 when Bob Dole was runner up to George H.W. Bush or in 1988 when Bush was runner up and VP to Reagan.

Apparently, there was no second place finisher that won as many primary contests as Romney did in 2008. But of course there was. Rick Santorum won 11 states,  I’m not saying that Rick Santorum should be the candidate who is nominated in 2016 based on 2012 performance, but if “next in line” is based on a strong second place finish, Santorum would seem to qualify.

However, the reason, Santorum isn’t identified as “next in line” is that he’s not an establishment Republican and ultimately that’s what GOP insiders have meant with the “next in line” candidate. It’s the next member of the Republican Establishment who lost but is in line to do what establishment candidates do by pandering mindlessly and coming up short on election day rather than standing for principle.

In a way, Santorum and other conservative candidates should be glad not to be seen standing in that line.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

Republicans Lead Generic Ballot in All Four Iowa Congressional Districts

A Des Moines Register and Mediacom poll shows Republicans with an advantage on a generic ballot in all four of Iowa’s congressional districts.

Michele Bachmann Wins Ames Straw Poll

With 16,892 votes cast today… which is more than the 2007 (14,302)…

Herman Cain at Ames Straw Poll: We Are The Defending Fathers

Herman Cain said “we are America” and that we don’t have to…

WATCH: Shane Vander Hart on CBN News

Caffeinated Thoughts’ Editor-in-Chief, Shane Vander Hart, appeared last Friday on CBN News’ Newswatch with Heather Sells to discuss the Iowa Caucus.