Medical-marijuana-sign
Medical marijuana neon sign at a dispensary on Ventura Boulevard in the San Fernando Valley—Los Angeles, CA.

Outgoing Chair of the Republican Party of Iowa, A.J. Spiker, wrote an op/ed on Friday that caused a stir over the weekend.  He called for the legalization of medical marijuana.

Reaction has been mixed.  The liberty wing of the party and libertarians are certainly in agreement.  One State Central Committee member, Jamie Johnson, said Spiker should be fired and not allowed to serve out his last week.  Really?  The State Central Committee will elect a new chair at their meeting this Saturday, I don’t think the party needs the additional drama.  Craig Robinson of The Iowa Republican called his op-ed, a distraction, but then again he believes Spiker’s entire chairmanship has pretty much been a distraction.

A few thoughts on this, and I admit my position on medical marijuana has evolved over the years.

First, why is anyone shocked that A.J. Spiker believes medical marijuana should be allowed?  That’s a standard libertarian/liberty position.  It shouldn’t surprise anyone.

Second, A.J. should have waited to submit this until after he has officially left.  Making a policy statement like this as the chairman of the party is in bad taste when you only have a week left.  As Robinson pointed out while a recent poll showed 59% of Iowans support legalizing medical marijuana, a majority of Republicans do not (only 46% do).  This would have been a better statement to make as the state representative of RandPAC or as a private citizen.  Spiker certainly has a right to his opinion, but he does not speak for all Republicans on this matter.

Third, I have mixed feelings  about medical marijuana.  Many know my son is a cancer survivor and seeing how the chemotherapy impacted him helped shed some light on this subject.  While I certainly don’t support its use for minors for medicinal use or otherwise, I do not object to it being prescribed to adults.  Several caveats to this.  Legalize the ingredients that provide the medicinal benefit.  Most people object to the delivery mechanism, not so much the ingredients itself.  Personally if my second caveat is met I really don’t care quite as much about the delivery mechanism, but legalization is more likely to happen if it was not dispensed as a joint.  It must be prescribed by a physician for treatment for an approved list of illnesses and must be dispensed out of an ACTUAL pharmacy where it can be controlled.  California’s experiment with medical marijuana shows that the lack of control was a joke.

Fourth, many people’s skepticism regarding medical marijuana is that the issue is typically seen as a gateway for legalizing recreational use.  Only 28% of Iowans support that.  Out of all of the drugs out there marijuana has the least amount of side effects, but there are still side effects.  Working with juvenile offenders I’ve seen its use become a gateway for other types of drug use.  I get the argument some make that it’s no different than alcohol.  I think time will tell as we see how different state experiments with legalizing marijuana pan out.

Fifth, a stronger case for legalizing (or decriminalizing)  marijuana (and other drugs as most libertarians support) would be stronger if we didn’t have a welfare state and people actually took responsibility for their behavior.  I see far too much tax money used on drug (and alcohol) addicts and treatment, and then there are federal laws that protect addicts from “discrimination.”  If that were truly dealt with then an argument could be made.  Until then it’s a non-starter because those who abuse are ultimately not held responsible.  Private help/treatment can and should be made available, but employers should not be coerced into keeping addicts on the payroll and taxpayers should have to pay for treatment.  That said based on my experience working with juvenile offenders it makes little sense to me to incarcerate adults who use.  Drug laws, in particular, sentencing needs to be addressed.  We are paying far too much in taxpayer money on the incarceration those who mainly only hurt themselves.

Photo credit: Laurie Avocado (CC-By-2.0)

6 comments
  1. Caffeine is more addictive than marijuana, and it is obvious from your self described column that you rely heavily on it to provoke thoughts. I feel sorry for you you addicted pathetic excuse for a human, unable to conduct something as easy as thinking by yourself with out your drug. Druggie ! You should be ashamed, why I bet you can’t even get up and get going without your “fix” every day. you should be imprisoned for your wanton desires. You wake up in a fog ever single day thinking “COFFEE!” “COFFEE !” I bet if you woke up out of money you would beg the nearest friend for a cup, complaining of your terrible headache
    saying ” I just need to clear my head & get woke up”. shame on you! I bet you’d even lower your self to drink a mountaindew if there was no coffee (I don’t need to tell you how bad soda is for you do I ? talk about poor delivery systems!)

    I suppose next you’ll want it for “medical reasons” such as
    “Studies have shown that coffee may have health benefits, including
    protecting against Parkinson’s disease, type 2 diabetes and liver
    disease, including liver cancer. It also appears to improve cognitive
    function and decrease the risk of depression.”

    Yeah !! Well I think you just want an excuse to do your drug. You WANT to be high on caffeine ! You love it so much you do it every day probably 3-4 times even. Druggie !

    Just kidding, I love coffee too I also know many people who use Marijuana for various reasons from medical to enjoyment to provoking thoughts. I think I’ve illustrated a salient point above, and hope you take a lesson from it. It’s an old one. “pot calls the kettle black”

    1. Actually I hardly ever drink soda. I get your point. I don’t really rely upon caffeine for salient thought though, but I do get headaches when I don’t have it (probably not a good sign… as I take another sip.). I agree that caffeine, like many things, is bad in excess.

      Also not sure you can entirely equate caffeine with marijuana… one helps with productivity, the other not so much unless it’s eating 🙂

      1. My point was not equitable effects, it was about choices we each make, also it depends on what you are trying to produce. I can see your not really a hardass about the subject I just thought your namesake provided an opportunity to show folks some reality. Have a great day !

        LOL I just saw your 4:15 productions is that some sort of response to 4:20 for marijuana ?

      2. That’s right. Rationalize away, druggie! If improving productivity is the standard to use to determine drug policy, we should legalize crystal meth!

        All kidding aside, a certain level of productivity is necessary to maintain living standards, but beyond that I can’t see the point. Taken to the extreme, increased productivity is bad even. China is already seeing the limits of what increased productivity has to offer (how many pairs of shoes does the world really need?) and beyond that, we’re looking at The Sorcerer’s Apprentice or something, which I dare say this whole drug war has indeed become.

  2. There is no reason this issue should be controversial among conservatives. Cannabis should be available for all adults to use for whatever reason they want. if you support cannabis prohibition you are not a conservative. You are a liberal that loves big government.

  3. I read a report that it is true, the Left has paid trolls go to non-Leftist websites and give opposing views. You sure get your share here, Shane.

Comments are closed.

Get CT In Your Inbox!

Don't miss a single update.

You May Also Like

Working Together For Iowans

Jack Whitver: There is a misperception Republicans and Democrats are unable to work together for the good the state of Iowa. That simply is not the case.

Meckler, Coburn Push for Iowa Senate to Pass Article V Convention Resolution

The Convention of the States Project held a rally at the Iowa State Capitol for the passage of HJR 12 (companion SJR 8), a resolution that calls for an Article V convention to propose amendments to the U.S. Constitution that impose fiscal restraints and limits the power and jurisdiction of the federal government.

By Jumping on the Impeachment Bandwagon, ‘Moderate’ Democrats Betray Constituents

Tana Goertz: Iowans deserve representatives who are serious about serving their constituents — not partisans who are completely beholden to their radical obstructionist bosses in DC.

Gas Tax: There Are Solutions, and Then There are SOLUTIONS

Opponents of raising the gas tax have failed to provide any solutions for how Iowa should maintain its roads and bridges with a projected shortfall.