
Photo credit: Iowa Department of Education (Public Domain)
When I read the ânewsâ that Iowa Governor Terry Branstad has a private Blackberry my first thought was this.
People still have Blackberry devices? Seriously⊠why would someone still use one?
My second thought was âso what?â
What made former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton use of a private email scandalous is that she conducted government business on said email with a private email server. That isnât transparency. There is absolutely nothing wrong with an elected official having a private smart phone, iPad, or other device provided they donât use it for state business.
Actually itâs perfectly reasonable that he has a private device to not only conduct personal business, but also any political business as that canât be done with state resources.
Hereâs the thing though⊠even if he received work email from a state email address on his device email sent to him and by him still run through a state email server (not that I would recommend using a personal device for that).
He doesnât though. Roxanne Conlin and State Senator Janet Petersen (R-Des Moines) seem to think that it is improbable for a Governor to exist without email. What did they think he did in his first two to three terms? Email didnât really become a thing until the mid 1990s, so heâs quite adept at being Governor without email. Also do they honestly think he has time to sit and wade through email? I know how time consuming it is for me with the amount of email I receive. There are days I wished I had people handling my email correspondence.
But heâs not even using it for that, so there is really nothing to this âstory.â Reading news and maintaining or reading a schedule on a personal device should not even remotely be considered âconducting state business.â
So keep the device, but Iâd recommend an upgrade.