U.S. Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa)
Photo credit: Dave Davidson (Prezography.com)
U.S. Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa)Photo credit: Dave Davidson (Prezography.com)
U.S. Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa)
Photo credit: Dave Davidson (Prezography.com)

(Washington, DC) In a major victory for communities across Iowa and the middle class, U.S. Senator Joni Ernst’s (R-IA) resolution of disapproval (S.J. Res. 22) to put an end to this expanded definition of the “Waters of the U.S.” (WOTUS) rule today passed the U.S. Senate with bipartisan support. The legislation now heads to the U.S. House of Representatives. Following passage in the Senate, Ernst issued the following statement:

Today’s passage to scrap the expanded WOTUS rule is a major win for our hardworking farmers, ranchers, manufacturers, and small businesses who are continuously ignored by the EPA. It is abundantly clear that the WOTUS rule is ill-conceived and breeds uncertainty, confusion, and more red tape that threatens the livelihoods of many in Iowa and across the country.

Our resolution stops the EPA from continuing to act as an unchecked federal agency of the Obama Administration, expanding its power over Iowa farmers, small businesses, ranchers, and other landowners in our rural communities. Iowans have an incentive to conserve their own land, they don’t need Washington bureaucrats from the EPA telling them what’s best. Passing this resolution is a major step forward to stop the EPA’s blatant power grab and scrap the expanded WOTUS rule. 

The time to act is now and I will not ignore the commonsense voices of hardworking Americans. President Obama will ultimately be forced to decide between an unchecked federal agency, or the livelihoods of our rural communities who say this overreaching WOTUS rule must be stopped. 

Click here and here to watch Senator Ernst’s remarks on the floor of the Senate. 

Senator Ernst’s Additional Efforts to Scrap WOTUS Rule:

  • Last month, Senator Ernst released a statement following a federal court ruling to issue a nationwide stay, suspending implementation of WOTUS.
  • The Iowa Senator cosponsored Senator Barrasso’s proposal, which provided clear principles and directions for the EPA and ACE to craft a WOTUS rule that takes into consideration positions held by key stakeholders.
  • In May, Senator Ernst denounced the EPA’s finalized WOTUS rule as harmful to Iowa.
  • In May, Senator Ernst also introduced Iowa farmer and small business owner Darcy Maulsby to testify on the impact of WOTUS before the Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee, and share her personal experience with the harmful impact and overregulation by the EPA in Iowa.
  • In February, Senator Ernst invited EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy to Iowa to see the potential impact of overregulation in Iowa. Administrator McCarthy has yet to take Senator Ernst up on this offer.

Impact on Iowa:

According to an analysis by the Iowa Farm Bureau, an expanded definition of the WOTUS rule would expand EPA jurisdiction to over approximately 97 percent of Iowa. See map below:

image001-1

You May Also Like

Trump’s Russia and Comey Troubles

President Donald Trump should welcome a thorough investigation into Russia’s involvement with 2016’s presidential race, but it is clear that he doesn’t.

Obamacare Hits a New Low

A new poll out today from Rasmussen on Obamacare: Just 41% of…

Cruz’s Proposed Bill Would Make El Chapo Pay for Border Wall

Kelvey Vander Hart: Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) introduced a bill this week based on a radical idea: getting El Chapo to fund the U.S.-Mexico border wall.

House Republicans, Mike Huckabee Blink on Budget Showdown, Sarah Palin Says Don’t Retreat

Well it would seem that Republicans in Congress blinked agreeing to a…