U.S. Senator Ben Sasse (R-NE) has been an outspoken critic of Donald Trump, before Trump was the presumptive nominee he said he would never back Trump. In an open letter Sasse wrote on Facebook, he reaffirmed that position saying Americans deserve another choice other than Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.
You can read his letter below:
TO: Those who think both leading presidential candidates are dishonest and have little chance of leading America forward:
(âŠor, stated more simply)
TO: The majority of America:
Note: If you are one of those rare souls who genuinely believe Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are honorable people â if they are the role models you want for your kids â then this letter is not for you. Instead, this letter is for the majority of Americans who wonder why the nation that put a man on the moon canât find a healthy leader who can take us forward together.
I want to tell you about four unsolicited conversations from the Fremont Wal-Mart this morning:
**Retired union Democrat meat-packer:
âWhat the heck is wrong with that city where you work? Why canât they give us a normal person? Is it really so hard?â
Me: âActually, it is for them â because most people in DC buy the nonsense that DC is the center of the world. You and I, despite our party differences, both agree that Fremont is the center.â
Union Democrat (interrupting): ââŠBecause this is where my grandkids are.â
**Young evangelical mom:
âI want to cry. I disagree with Hillary Clinton on almost every single thing â but I will vote for her before Trump. I could never tell my kids later that I voted for that man.â
**Middle-aged Republican male (more political than the other folks):
âIt feels like the train-car to hell is accelerating. Why is DC more filled with weirdos and yet more powerful at the same time? How do we slow this down long enough to have a conversation about actually fixing our country?â
**Trump supporter (again, unsolicited):
âPlease understand: Iâm going to vote for him, but I donât like him. And I donât trust him â I mean, Iâm not stupid. But how else can I send a signal to Washington?!â
________
Iâve ignored my phone most of today, but the voicemail is overflowing with party bosses and politicos telling me that âalthough Trump is terrible,â we âhave toâ support him, âbecause the only choice is Trump or Hillary.â
This open letter aims simply to ask âWHY is that the only choice?â
Melissa and I got the kids launched on homework, so Iâve been sitting out by the river, reflecting on the great gap between what folks in my town are talking about, and what folks in the DC bubble are talking about.
I trust the judgment of this farm town way more than I trust DC. And so Iâd like to share a dozen-ish observations on these Wal-Mart and other conversations today:
1.
Washington isnât fooling anyone — Neither political party works. They bicker like children about tiny things, and yet they canât even identify the biggest issues we face. Theyâre like a couple arguing about what color to paint the living room, and meanwhile, their house is on fire. They resort to character attacks as step one because they think voters are too dumb for a real debate. They very often prioritize the agendas of lobbyists (for whom many of them will eventually work) over the urgent needs of Main Street America. I signed up for the Party of Abraham Lincoln — and I will work to reform and restore the GOP — but letâs tell the plain truth that right now both parties lack vision.
2.
As a result, normal Americans donât like either party. If you ask Americans if they identify as Democrat or Republican, almost half of the nation interrupts to say: âNeither.â
3.
Young people despise the two parties even more than the general electorate. And why shouldnât they? The main thing that unites most Democrats is being anti-Republican; the main thing that unites most Republicans is being anti-Democrat. No one knows what either party is for — but almost everyone knows neither party has any solutions for our problems. âUnproductiveâ doesnât begin to summarize how messed up this is.
4.
Our problems are huge right now, but one of the most obvious is that weâve not passed along the meaning of America to the next generation. If we donât get them to re-engage — thinking about how we defend a free society in the face of global jihadis, or how we balance our budgets after baby boomers have dishonestly over-promised for decades, or how we protect First Amendment values in the face of the safe-space movement â then all will indeed have been lost. One of the bright spots with the rising generation, though, is that they really would like to rethink the often knee-jerk partisanship of their parents and grandparents. We should encourage this rethinking.
5.
These two national political parties are enough of a mess that I believe they will come apart. It might not happen fully in 2016 â and Iâll continue fighting to revive the GOP with ideas — but when peopleâs needs arenât being met, they ultimately find other solutions.
6.
In the history of polling, weâve basically never had a candidate viewed negatively by half of the electorate. This year, we have two. In fact, we now have the two most unpopular candidates ever â Hillary by a little, and Trump by miles (including now 3 out of 4 women â who vote more and influence more votes than men). There are dumpster fires in my town more popular than these two âleaders.â
7.
With Clinton and Trump, the fix is in. Heads, they win; tails, you lose. Why are we confined to these two terrible options? This is America. If both choices stink, we reject them and go bigger. Thatâs what we do.
8.
Remember: our Founders didnât want entrenched political parties. So why should we accept this terrible choice?
9.
So…letâs have a thought experiment for a few weeks: Why shouldnât America draft an honest leader who will focus on 70% solutions for the next four years? You know…an adult?
(Two notes for reporters:
**Such a leader should be able to campaign 24/7 for the next six months. Therefore he/she likely canât be an engaged parent with little kids.
**Although Iâm one of the most conservative members of the Senate, I’m not interested in an ideological purity test, because even a genuine consensus candidate would almost certainly be more conservative than either of the two dishonest liberals now leading the two national parties.)
10.
Imagine if we had a candidate:
…who hadnât spent his/her life in politics either buying politicians or being bought
âŠwho didnât want to stitch together a coalition based on anger but wanted to take a whole nation forward
âŠwho pledged to serve for only one term, as a care-taker problem-solver for this messy moment
âŠwho knew that Washington isnât competent to micromanage the lives of free people, but instead wanted to SERVE by focusing on 3 or 4 big national problems,
such as:
A. A national security strategy for the age of cyber and jihad;
B. Honest budgeting/entitlement reform so that we stop stealing from future generations;
C. Empowering states and local governments to improve K-12 education, and letting Washington figure out how to update federal programs to adjust to now needing lifelong learners in an age where folks are obviously not going to work at a single job for a lifetime anymore; and
D. Retiring career politicians by ending all the incumbency protections, special rules, and revolving door opportunities for folks who should be public âservants,â not masters.
This really shouldnât be that hard.
The oath I took is to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. In brief, that means Iâm for limited government.
And there is no reason to believe that either of these two national frontrunners believe in limiting anything about DCâs power.
I believe that most Americans can still be for limited government again — if they were given a winsome candidate who wanted Washington to focus on a small number of really important, urgent things — in a way that tried to bring people together instead of driving us apart.
I think there is room â an appetite â for such a candidate.
What am I missing?
More importantly, what are the people at the Fremont Wal-Mart missing?
Because I donât think they are wrong. They deserve better. They deserve a Congress that tackles the biggest policy problems facing the nation. And they deserve a president who knows that his or her job is not to âreign,â but to serve as commander-in-chief and to âfaithfully executeâ the laws â not to claim imperial powers to rewrite them with his pen and phone.
The sun is mostly set on the Platte River — and the kids need baths. So gânight.
Ben