Donald Trump speaking with supporters at a campaign rally in Phoenix, AZ.
Photo credit: Gage Skidmore
ADVERTISEMENT

Donald Trump speaking with supporters at a campaign rally in Phoenix, AZ.Photo credit: Gage Skidmore
Donald Trump speaking with supporters at a campaign rally in Phoenix, AZ.
Photo credit: Gage Skidmore

Donald Trump has had a love-hate relationship with the press. They give him tons of earned media which no doubt benefited his campaign during the primaries. The media also has been giving him attention, but it has been focused on, myself included, off-the-cuff remarks made that have been politically unconventional – which is putting it mildly. There is truth to his complaints that the media has not focused as much on Hillary Clinton’s problems with her emails, the Clinton Foundation, and the fact she hasn’t taken a press conference since I can’t even remember.

That isn’t to say those things haven’t been covered, they have. They have just been overshadowed by things that Donald Trump has said on the stump that is mind-boggling to those of us who have observed the political process for some time now.

I’m not entirely sure what he was responding to, but yesterday Trump tweeted this.

Actually freedom of the press does mean, by and large, that newspapers and others are allowed to say and write whatever they want. In times when what is reported or false, if done deliberately, there are libel laws that can go into effect.

Here is the problem. Anytime there is negative reports, opinion pieces he disagrees with, or a poll that doesn’t favored him – it is false, wrong or skewed.

Last spring Donald Trump said he wanted to “loosen up the libel laws.” This is concerning. It is concerning when Democrats talk like this, and it should be concerning when Republicans talk like this.

The freedom of the press is not determined by whether or not a politician believes what they say, report or write is false or not. In terms of public figures it isn’t even considered libel unless malicious intent can be proved. This is especially true in a political context. Voters get to decide what is true or not in these circumstances, not judges. Trump can certainly correct the record and rebuke the press when they get it wrong, but take away freedom or sue? No.

If Donald Trump wins the presidency he is going to have to grow a thicker skin, and he is not the one (or Hillary Clinton for that matter) who is the arbiter of what constitutes free speech that includes the freedom of the press, and what doesn’t.

This is a double-edged sword for if a Republican president is allowed to go after media outlets he or she deem unfriendly, the shoe will eventually be on the other foot.

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to receive stimulating conservative Christian commentary in your inbox.

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
You May Also Like

Rasmussen National Poll Shows Santorum in Dead Heat with Obama, Gingrich Spiraling Downward

Today’s Rasmussen Head-to-Head polls shows that Rick Santorum is a contender and puts a chink in Newt Gingrich’s electability argument.

Graham: Jo Jorgensen Doesn’t Belong in the Presidential Debate

Adam Graham: Jo Jorgensen shouldn’t be on the debate stage because it’s a privilege, and the Libertarian Party hasn’t earned it.

Donald Trump Playing Games on Ted Cruz’s Eligibility

Adam Graham: The dishonest and cavalier way Donald Trump has addressed this issue should disqualify him from consideration to be the Republican nominee.

Rod Blum Challenges Monica Vernon to 10 Debates

Congressman Rod Blum (R-Iowa) challenged Democrat opponent Monica Vernon to a series of 10 public debates through Iowa’s 1st Congressional District.