President Donald Trump speaks at CPAC 2017.
Photo credit: Gage Skidmore
President Donald Trump speaks at CPAC 2017.
Photo credit: Gage Skidmore

President Donald Trump’s counsel, John Dowd, told Mike Allen of Axios that Trump, as President, can not obstruct justice.

The “President cannot obstruct justice because he is the chief law enforcement officer under [the Constitution’s Article II] and has every right to express his view of any case,” he claimed.

In question is a tweet published on Saturday from President Trump’s personal Twitter account that Dowd claims to have written:

Trump’s critics point to this tweet as an admission that President Trump knew his former National Security Advisor lied to the FBI before he fired FBI Director James Comey.

Addressing the first question of whether the President of the United States can obstruct justice. Of course, he can. Putting the President above the law in this instance is asinine.

It is unlikely to see President Trump indicted on those charges, however, because he first has to be removed from office. The House of Representatives would have to impeach, and then the Senate would have to convict. Republicans control both chambers.

I don’t see that happening unless Mueller presents an incredibly compelling case.

So far, there is no such case. Trump was defended by an unlikely source – Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz. Today on Fox & Friends, Dershowitz criticized U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein who said an obstruction of justice case is being made.

Dershowitz said Feinstein does not know what she is talking about. He noted that President Trump, under the Constitution, has the right to fire the FBI Director. Charging a President with obstruction of justice for exercising his constitutional right, Dershowitz said, would cause a “constitutional crisis in the United States.”

Dershowitz explained that to charge a President with obstruction of justice, proof of illegal acts is needed. Such was the case with President Nixon paying “hush money” during the Watergate scandal, and even President Clinton, who allegedly tried to influence potential witnesses.

So there are circumstances where a case can be made for obstruction, but as of right now there is no evidence to credibly make that claim.

That could change as Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation presses forward, but as of right now it is merely wishful thinking.

You May Also Like

Ben Carson Comes to Iowa as a Serious 2016 Contender

Ben Carson’s visit to Iowa for the FAMiLY Leader event will give Iowans a good look at someone who is set to be a serious contender in the 2016 Iowa Caucus.

Steve King: I Want My Liberty Back

Congressman Steve King (R-IA) spoke at 2012 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC)…

Speaker Paul Ryan: A Few Perpetrators of Evil Do Not Represent Us

Speaker Paul Ryan encouraged Americans to take a moment for reflection and prayer after the shooting of 12 police officers in Dallas that left five dead.

The Unmentioned Heartbreak of the Roy Moore Debacle

Pat Nicklaus: I was originally angry with all of the division over the Roy Moore issue, division over what amounts to 1/100th of the US Senate.  Now, I’m just heartbroken.