U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Sarah Stierch (CC BY 4.0)
ADVERTISEMENT

On December 4, 2018, the American College of Pediatricians, the American Association of Pro-life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Christian Medical and Dental Associations, and the Catholic Medical Association, representing over 30,000 health professionals across the nation, sent a letter applauding the Trump Administration’s intention to uphold the scientific definition of sex in federal law and policy. This letter is also endorsed by 32 legal organizations, policy groups, and independent physicians, therapists and academics, including bioethicists. 
The letter (read below) details how the previous administration’s unprecedented guidance to conflate gender identity with sex in law and policy is unscientific, potentially medically dangerous, and has already proven harmful to girls and women.

Sex is a biological trait that defines living things as male and female based on the complement of sex chromosomes and the presence of reproductive organs. “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of male and female, respectively, and are found in every cell of the human body. Sex is established at conception, declares itself in utero, and is acknowledged at birth.  

The final result of sex development in humans is unambiguously male or female over 99.98% of the time. “Intersex” is a term that encompasses a variety of congenital disorders of sex development that result in sex ambiguity and/or a mismatch between sex chromosomes and appearance regardless of cause. These disorders occur in less than 0.02% of all births and do not constitute additional sexes. Sex is not a spectrum.

As biologist Dr. Colin Wright states, “The claim that classifying people’s sex upon anatomy and genetics ‘has no basis in science’ has itself no basis in reality, as any method exhibiting a predictive accuracy of over 99.98% would place it among the most precise methods in all the life sciences.”

Individuals who identify as transgender remain either biological males or females. This fact has upon their health due to sex-specific illnesses and more. Diseases that affect both sexes often have different frequencies, presentations responses to treatments in males and females; therefore, different preventative, diagnostic, and treatment approaches may be required for males and females. 

Compassion for those who identify as transgender must never eclipse the reality of sex. The rights and well-being of all Americans – including those who trans-identify – depends on it. If you agree, you may add your signature here.

Photo Credit: Sarah Stierch (CC BY 4.0)

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to receive stimulating conservative Christian commentary in your inbox.

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
You May Also Like

Thomas, Alito Blast Obergefell Decision For Its Impact on Religious Liberty

“By choosing to privilege a novel constitutional right over the religious liberty interests explicitly protected in the First Amendment… the Court has created a problem that only it can fix.”

Five Reasons to Oppose The Equality Act

Shane Vander Hart: The Equality Act of 2019 is not necessary or viewpoint neutral, and it does not respect privacy, women, or parents.

AOC Discussing VA: “If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It.”

Freshman U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., said the discussion about the VA reminded her of the refrain, “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”

Ernst Asks Barrett Her View of Judicial Impartiality

U.S. Senator Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, asked Judge Amy Coney Barrett about judicial impartiality, the role of court precedence, and agency rulemaking.