ADVERTISEMENT

WASHINGTON – Republican U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee spoke on the floor of the United States Senate about the House Judiciary Committee voting 24 to 16 on Tuesday to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress for his unwillingness to release an unredacted version of the Mueller Report.

The report’s few redactions were made because some material subject to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) that by law can’t be made public. Also, the material included items still before grand juries in ongoing investigations. The redactions also include content the intelligence community identifies as potentially compromising sensitive sources and methods. Lastly, material that would unduly infringe on the personal privacy and reputational interests of peripheral third parties.

Barr made an mostly unredacted version available to the leadership of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees.

“Mr. Barr has been transparent,” Grassley said. “He made the Mueller report available to them – 99 percent un-redacted in the obstruction section of that report. Instead of reading it, the Democrats who voted contempt moved like lightning straight to the charge of contempt. To me, that’s not good-faith negotiation.”

Grassley discussed when the House of Representatives found former Obama Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress by a 255 to 67 vote.

“(T)he House only held Attorney General Holder in contempt after many months of negotiations over documents that were withheld on bogus grounds,” he said. “And just for, connecting that to an issue, that was the Fast and the Furious investigation that I was involved in as well. We had a very good case against Holder. We attempted to negotiate with Holder for a long period of time before the other body held him in contempt.”

Grassley added that the case against Barr was not a good one.

He also warned about potential consequences to the House Judiciary Committee vote. “(T)his is going to make it very, very difficult in the future for Congress to conduct its constitutional role of oversight because future presidents are going to use this as an example of bad-faith attempt to negotiate with the executive branch of government to get what you want. And maybe what they want isn’t real information or real congressional oversight. They may be trying to make political points,” he said.

Watch below:

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to receive stimulating conservative Christian commentary in your inbox.

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
You May Also Like

Vander Hart: Six Ideas for Criminal Justice Reform

Shane Vander Hart offers six ideas to consider for criminal justice reform to address mass incarceration while respecting the Bill of Rights.

Beto O’Rourke: “Our Country Was Founded On Racism”

Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke of Texas said at an Arkansas Democratic Party event that the United States was founded on racism.

Jumping Into Medicare For All With Eyes Wide Shut

Marilyn Singleton: Medicare for All could be one of those concepts that “seemed like a good idea at the time” – just like diving head first off a cliff into an inviting but shallow pool of water.

Labor Department Strengthens Religious Exemption for Federal Contractors

Eugene Scalia: “Religious organizations should not have to fear that acceptance of a federal contract or subcontract will require them to abandon their religious character or identity.”