protest
PC: Rosemary Ketchum

It’s fun to listen to a football fan who is passionate about their team and who sticks with them through the wins and losses. After all, enthusiasm is infectious. It’s not enjoyable to listen to someone who simply wants the rival team to lose. 

A lighthearted illustration, but an important point. We will be more interesting, enthusiastic, and passionate people if we become those who are FOR things more than we are AGAINST things. 

In his book Them: Why We Hate Each Other And How To Heal, Senator Ben Sasse (R-NE) commented on the for versus against divide: 

“What sustains people, really, is sharing a common cause, a common purpose – a sense of being in it together…We’re meant to be for things and people, but absent of that, most of us will choose to be against things and people, together, rather than to be alone. (pgs. 71-72)”

Nowhere does this ring truer than in the arena Sasse is playing in: politics. 

Instead of being for sensible border and immigration reform, most are against decriminalization or against any type of holding facility. 

Instead of being for sensible use of tax dollars, most are against the type of spending the other side of the aisle wants to pursue. 

Instead of being for reasonable environmental policy, most are against climate change embracers or climate change deniers. 

An example could probably be made of any policy point. Politics would look a lot different if we focused on being FOR things instead of simply against them. 

What if we were FOR sensible healthcare reform instead of just against whatever the other ‘team’ is doing? 

What if we were FOR saving taxpayer dollars instead of just being against spending them however the other side of the aisle wants to see them spent?

What if we were FOR comprehensive criminal justice reform, not just against parts that we think will undermine causes our party has held closely for decades? 

It is not only far more interesting to be for something, but it is far more effective. There are certainly times where we need to stand against certain ideas and opinions, but, where we are able, let’s strive to be people who are for things, not just against.

PC: Rosemary Ketchum

You May Also Like

Why Do Evangelicals Tend to Be Politically Conservative?

Collin Brendemuehl: It is not that conservatism and evangelicalism go hand-in-hand. There is no theological or political bond between them. Evangelicalism existed before conservatism and will exist after it is gone.

Caffeinated Book Review: Christ of the Indian Road by E. Stanley Jones

Christ of the Indian Road is a book comprised of the observations E.…

Rand Paul Airs Government Grievances in Annual Festivus Twitter Rant

Kelvey Vander Hart: Festivus may have been made popular by “Seinfeld,” but fiscal conservatives have come to associate the day with one person: U.S. Senator Rand Paul

Vander Hart: Xavier Bacerra Is The Worst Choice for HHS

President-Elect Joe Biden’s appointment of Xavier Bacerra to head Health and Human Services is an insult to anyone who cares about religious liberty.