Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
ADVERTISEMENT

WASHINGTON – Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas challenged the justices to confront the realities of what the Supreme Court “has wrought” through abortion rulings after it declined Friday to revive Alabama’s ban prohibiting dilation and evacuation (D&E) abortion.

Justice Thomas joined his colleagues in deciding not to hear West Alabama Women’s Center v. Thomas Miller, but he said the Court eventually must face the consequences from its past abortion decisions. The justice said that it is “implausible” that the Constitution would protect the dismemberment of a living child.

The U.S. 11th Circuit Court of Appeals blocked the Alabama Unborn Child Protection from Dismemberment Abortion Act that prohibits “dismemberment” abortions of live unborn babies, although two of the three judges indicated they would have upheld the law but were bound by Supreme Court precedent.

In his concurring opinion Justice Thomas wrote, “The notion that anything in the Constitution prevents States from passing laws prohibiting the dismembering of a living child is implausible.” He also quoted the circuit court’s decision in describing the abortion procedure in detail: “It bleeds to death as it is torn limb from limb. It can, however, survive for a time while its limbs are being torn off. . .  At the end of the abortion — after the larger pieces of the unborn child have been torn off with forceps and the remaining pieces sucked out with a vacuum — the abortionist is left with a tray full of pieces.”

“This case serves as a stark reminder that our abortion jurisprudence has spiraled out of control. Earlier this Term, we were confronted with lower court decisions requiring States to allow abortions based solely on the race, sex, or disability of the child. …Today, we are confronted with decisions requiring States to allow abortion via live dismemberment. None of these decisions is supported by the text of the Constitution. Although this case does not present the opportunity to address our demonstrably erroneous “undue burden” standard, we cannot continue blinking the reality of what this Court has wrought,” wrote Thomas.

“Justice Clarence Thomas has addressed the justices on behalf of the more than 62 million unborn children crying out from the grave and the countless Americans who know that abortion is human genocide,” Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel, said. “There is nothing in the Constitution that prevents states from passing laws prohibiting abortion. Every American who values the sanctity of human life should be encouraged that Justice Thomas has invited the Supreme Court to address the reality that its’ precedents on this issue have wrought nothing but death.

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to receive stimulating conservative Christian commentary in your inbox.

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
You May Also Like

As Women’s History Month Ends, I’ll Keep Working to Enable Fellow Female Leaders to Succeed.

Joni Ernst: At the federal level, I’m going to keep working with Democrats and Republicans to ensure my fellow female leaders continue to have opportunities to succeed.

Kamala Harris Tanks in New CNN Poll, Biden Bounces Back

U.S. Senator Kamala Harris, D-Calif., dropped 12 points since June in a new CNN poll showing her bump after the first debate was erased after the second.

Why You Should Keep Up With Local Politics

Kelvey Vander Hart: Don’t ignore municipal politics – your involvement is important.

Vice President Pence Can’t Reject Electoral Votes

Shane Vander Hart: Vice President Mike Pence does not have the power to reject electoral votes, the Constitution does not give him that power.