During the House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment hearing on Tuesday morning, the Democratic Counsel, Daniel Goldman, suggests in a question to Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the National Security Council’s Director for European Affairs, that bureaucrats create foreign policy and the President is obligated to follow their talking points.

Watch:

Goldman: “Is there a process to determine official U.S. policy?”

Vindman: “Yes, my job is to coordinate U.S. policies throughout the preceding year that I been on staff. I had undertaken an effort to make sure that we had a coherent and just policy.”

Goldman: “And as you listened to the call, did you observe whether President Trump was following the talking points based on the official U.S. policy?”

Vindman: “Counsel, the President could choose to use the talking points or not, he’s the President, but they were not consistent with what I provided, yes.”

Obviously, the President sets the direction and the U.S. State Department, National Security Council, etc. work out the details. The President also needs people to do research and provide sound counsel. The President would be wise to listen to a variety of counsel.

That doesn’t mean those people determine official U.S. policy. That is what the President does. To Vindman’s credit, he points out that the President is not bound to use talking points provided to him.

Because he isn’t. No, president is. It may not be wise to stray from provided talking points, but the bureaucrats follow the President, not the other way around.

You May Also Like

Hendrickson: ‘Hands Off The Supreme Court’

John Hendrickson: “The threat of ‘packing’ the Supreme Court should alarm every American because it threatens the very foundations of our constitutional republic.”

Social Conservative Group Unveils 2019 Agenda for Pro-Family Conservatives

U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) helped introduce American Principles Project Foundation’s “Contract with American Families” at their 2018 State Lunch.

Five Reasons Why Republicans Should Consider Voting For Jo Jorgensen

Kelvey Vander Hart: Here are five reasons why Republicans should vote for Jo Jorgensen instead of President Trump.

Vander Hart: Gorsuch v. Gorsuch

Shane Vander Hart: In the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in Bostock, Justice Neil Gorsuch contradicted his own past remarks in 2016 and in Masterpiece.