President Donald Trump and Speaker Nancy Pelosi greet one another before Trump’s 2019 State of the Union Address.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., demonstrated that the impeachment of President Donald Trump was nothing but partisan politics by her delay of transmitting the articles of impeachment to the United States Senate.

She indicated on Wednesday after the impeachment vote that she would delay stating that she was concerned about a fair trial. “So far we haven’t seen anything that looks fair to us,” Pelosi told reporters after the House voted to make President Trump the third president in U.S. history to be impeached. “That would’ve been our intention, but we’ll see what happens over there.”

She reaffirmed that stance on Twitter on Monday morning.

Pelosi is engaging in some quid pro quo of her own. The American people were told by House Democrats that it was vital that President Trump be impeached and that it be done quickly as time was of the essence.

“We view this as urgent,” U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee said.

“They keep taking it to court and, no, we’re not going to wait till the courts decide,” Pelosi said. “We can’t wait for that.”

During the impeachment hearings before the House Judiciary Committee, U.S. Rep. Jarrold Nadler, D-N.Y., stated numerous times that they had to act quickly with the 2020 election approaching.

However, had they taken their time they may passed stronger articles of impeachment. Had they fought in the courts they may have been able to compel core witnesses to testify.

But they didn’t. They rushed it. They did a shoddy job. They lacked first-hand witnesses. They provided no supporting documentation. They did not offer a compelling case evidenced by not a single Republican vote in favor of impeachment, including a number of Republicans who are retiring and who have criticized the president in the past.

Not one, and they lost two members of their own caucus on the article dealing with abuse of power, and three in the vote in favor of the article citing obstruction of Congress.

According to Article 1, Section 2 of the Constitution, the U.S. House of Representatives have the sole power of impeachment. Section 3 of Article 1 of the Constitution says that “The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments.”

It is improper for the House to dictate to the Senate how they conduct their trial just as the Senate can’t dictate to the House how they conduct their inquiry.

The House didn’t offer a fair process and now they expect the Senate to act differently?

Both have a constitutional duty, it’s time to let the Senate do theirs. The Senate should offer a full trial. They should include witnesses. What they shouldn’t have to do is do the House’s job for them when they failed to fully investigate the allegations they made against President Trump.

Speaker Pelosi is playing a partisan game and it seems the real reason this is being done is to use the impeachment as a censure of sorts without giving the President the benefit of a trial. Which could backfire and rightfully so.

Subscribe For Latest Updates

Sign up to receive stimulating conservative Christian commentary in your inbox.

Invalid email address
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Thanks for subscribing!
  1. Pelosi’s strategy will allow time for additional allegations to surface, such as the disclosure yesterday that the delay on Ukrainian military aid occurred within 2 hours of the phone call. Of course, in fact a determination to delay the aid had been done before the call, but that’s not how the media narrative reports it. It’s the same drip-drip approach that almost worked in the Kavanaugh fight. Here mounting allegations will undoubtedly put pressure on McConnell and not Pelosi. Whether her strategy will backfire remains to be seen.
    I think the whole impeachment enterprise is not so much about booting Trump from office as it is about persuading people who voted reluctantly for Trump in 2016 to vote for somebody else or not vote in 2020. The 2016 election would have turned out differently if just a few people in some key states hadn’t voted for Trump. If enough “dirt” is dished out to impugn his competency or his temperament, maybe lightening will strike for the Dems in 2020, despite a good economy.

  2. The House impeachment process and articles of impeachment are so flawed that the only reasonable outcome is for the President’s representatives to make a motion to dismiss based on (a) the unfair process and (b) failure to state a claim of an impeachable offense and for that motion to be granted.

Comments are closed.

You May Also Like

What Does the New Trade Deal With Japan Mean for Iowa?

Chuck Grassley: The Japan trade deal will boost confidence and profits for Iowa farmers who are struggling with low commodity prices, poor weather, and retaliatory tariffs.

Labor Department Strengthens Religious Exemption for Federal Contractors

Eugene Scalia: “Religious organizations should not have to fear that acceptance of a federal contract or subcontract will require them to abandon their religious character or identity.”

Vander Hart: Moving the Goalposts on COVID-19

Shane Vander Hart: “Flatten the curve” has become “crush the curve” and “slow the spread” has become “stop the spread.” And the COVID-19 goalposts are moved.

Vander Hart: Six Ideas for Criminal Justice Reform

Shane Vander Hart offers six ideas to consider for criminal justice reform to address mass incarceration while respecting the Bill of Rights.