Photo credit: Gage Skidmore (CC-By-2.0)

Not long ago, U.S. Senator Mitt Romney, R- Utah, said that “We need to stand up and say that black lives matter.”

If we take that to mean that black men, women, and children’s lives are valuable and important, few of any race would disagree with the Senator. The problem is that the Senator also marched in a protest organized by Black Lives Matter, which appears to be a radical Marxist movement at its organizational core.

This action suggests that the Senator intended something more by his words than merely that black lives are valuable and important. No surprise there. The Senator is a gifted panderer.

But whatever Romney’s intent, it seems that it’s nearly impossible at present to distinguish between “black lives matter,” the conviction, and “Black Lives Matter,” the political movement.

This problem leaves many of us frustrated when we attempt to express our concern for black people on the one hand and distance ourselves from BLM on the other. Regrettably, in a world that no longer has a place for such nuance, for many of us, the best course of action has been to remain silent.

This is Brian Myers with your Caffeinated Thought Of The Week.

You May Also Like

Evangelicals Should Be Wary Giving Unconditional Loyalty to Any Politician

Shane Vander Hart: My only encouragement to Christians is to vote their conscience in the ballot box, then hold whoever is elected accountable.

“Equality Act” Guts Religious Freedom

Mat Staver: “The so-called ‘Equality Act’ eviscerates freedom in general and religious freedom in particular.”

Fort Sill’s History as a WWII Japanese Internment Camp is Irrelevant

With the decision to move migrant children to Fort Sill, the base’s World War II history is deemed relevant when it wasn’t when the same thing happened in 2014.

John Delaney Stood Out In First Debate Because of His Sanity

Shane Vander Hart: U.S. Rep. John Delaney of Maryland was the sanest candidate on stage during the first NBC News Democratic Presidential Debate.