coronavirus news on screen
Photo by Markus Spiske on Pexels.com

Frequently over the last six months I’ve seen people write the following pronouncement about COVID-19: “It’s not the flu!”

They are right, of course.

COVID-19 can be a vicious disease in a number of ways in which influenza is not. For example, COVID-19 can cause blood clotting issues in severe cases. The clotting can manifest itself in deep vein thrombosis or in tiny clots that block small blood vessels in the lungs, contributing to respiratory failure. The virus also can permanently damage the heart muscle, and cause long term damage to other organs such as the kidneys and the brain. Again, it can be a vicious disease in ways that the flu isn’t.

But when people say “It’s not the flu!” they are really missing the point that I think is being made when other people compare COVID-19 to the flu. People aren’t comparing the nature of the two diseases in any medical or scientific way. Whether they explicitly say it or not, what they are driving at is risk assessment. It’s something we all do in virtually every area of life, usually without much thought.

Influenza is something of a gold standard in terms of risk assessment with respect to infectious disease. The reasons for that are obvious: We are quite familiar with influenza. We know its pandemic history and its mortality history. When people make comparisons between COVID-19 and the flu, a lot of them aren’t seeing a considerable difference (so far, at least) between the two in that regard. But they see a big difference in our response to COVID-19, knowing that our response to the flu hasn’t involved business closings, quarantines, and the like for the past century– not even in the case of an outbreak such as the one in 1968 which took the lives of 100,000 Americans.

Of course it’s not the flu. But relative to risk assessment in connection with public policy, perhaps it should be considered more like it.

This is Brian Myers with your Caffeinated Thought of the Week.

You May Also Like

Harmful Transgender Mandate Struck Down In Federal Court

A federal district court protected the rights of families and their doctors to make medical decisions for their child free from government interference.

Pediatricians: Normalizing Gender Dysphoria is Dangerous and Unethical

The American College of Pediatricians: End the normalization of gender dysphoria in children because of the harm it has caused confused children.

Christ at the Checkpoint Undermines Evangelical Support for Israel

Christ at the Checkpoint ignores the nasty reality of the Middle East, where democracy, human rights and religious liberty at largely confined to Israel.

Why Small Nations Don’t Need The EU (To Change The World)

Small nations don’t need the EU to change the world, in fact smaller nations, like Sweden, had more influence before joining the European Union.