U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg speaks on the Main Stage of the National Book Festival, August 31, 2019. Photo by Shawn Miller/Library of Congress

When I first learned of Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s passing, I thought and prayed for her family and colleagues who are mourning. I reflected upon eternity as I always do when someone dies. What I did not want to do was consider the political ramifications of her death. 

Frankly, the last thing 2020 needed was a Supreme Court vacancy in a presidential election year that is already extremely contentious. Yet, here we are.

I would love to see an originalist jurist replace Justice Ginsburg; I think there are many good names on President Donald Trump’s list (including the additions he released earlier this month.)

I understand the political reasons and temptation to go forward with a nominee and confirmation process that would swing the court to a 6 to 3 Republican-appointed majority. I get it. It could be a missed opportunity.

I also understand President Trump has the constitutional authority and right to appoint a nominee just as President Obama did after Justice Antonin Scalia died. The Senate also has the constitutional authority to confirm an appointment. This is not a question of what is constitutional. 

I also understand the arguments that President Trump is not in his last term, he’s not yet a lame duck, and President Obama was. I understand Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s “Biden rule” argument

I believe that pushing a Supreme Court nominee through the confirmation process before the election will turn a dumpster fire election into something much worse.

Turn the temperature down, put aside conventional political wisdom, and let voters decide. Take the high road. If President Trump wins and Republicans hold the Senate, then here comes that 6-3 majority. If he doesn’t win, then we’re looking at, for the most part, status quo. 

Now, had Senate Republicans not waited and confirmed Merrick Garland in 2016, my opinion would be much different. Regardless of how McConnell spins confirming a nominee now, it will look like hypocrisy. It could also cost them the election.

The worst scenario should President Trump and Senate Republicans push through a nominee and then lose in 2020, then I think court-packing becomes inevitable.

It is unfortunate the Supreme Court has become so important. It was never meant to have the power to shape our lives in the way that it does. Congress has failed to properly legislate, leaving far too much up to the executive and judicial branches. 

But here we are. 

Instead, both presidential candidates should present their vision for judicial nominations. President Trump has shared his list. I agree with U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, who called on former Vice President Joe Biden to share his list of potential jurists. He should, Americans have a right to know. 

Campaign on it and then let Americans decide.

If Vice President Biden wins, then Americans have spoken. If President Trump and Senate Republicans win, they can move forward with a nominee and a fresh mandate. If we have an opposing President and Senate, they can fight it out in 2021.

And perhaps the temperature will be lowered slightly as we move toward November.

You May Also Like

Fiorina Blasts Republican Party For Demanding Loyalty to Trump

Carly Fiorina took to Twitter on Monday criticizing the Republican Party for its treatment of Republicans who criticize President Donald Trump.

Senator Ernst Introduces Government Spending Transparency Legislation

Kelvey Vander Hart: The Cost Openness and Spending Transparency (COST) Act introduced by Sen. Ernst should make all fiscal conservatives very happy.

Senators Propose Changes to Ensure Government Is Funded on Time

U.S. Senators David Perdue (R-GA), James Lankford (R-OK), and Joni Ernst (R-IA) propose milestones to end instances of last-minute budget battles and deals.

Democrats Go All In on Open Borders and the Welfare State

All ten candidates on stage for the second night of the NBC News Presidential Debates said their government-run health care plan would cover undocumented immigrants.