Hmm… I’m not saying this would be accepted in the U.S., but it would again put us at odds with the U.N.  This would be a clear violation of the First Amendment as it aims to curtail speech that offends religion, specifically Islam critics.  Religious groups and advocates for free speech say the resolution is spreading Sharia law to the Western World

What kool-aid are they drinking?  Why are we supporting them again?

Here is a segment on it with Lou Dobbs, and in it he interviews Christopher Hitchens, Vanity Fair Columnist and author of God is Not Great: How Religions Poison Everything.

Hitchens said:

“That is totalitarianism defined.  It’s a rape and butchery of the First Amendment of our Constitution.”

I agree with Hitchens on very little, but the comment above I do.  Even if the blasphemy is directed toward Christians.  I don’t like hearing blasphemy, but in the United States you have the constitutional right to be theologically wrong.

What do you think?  Bulldozers as Dobbs suggests?

HT: International Free Press Society via Pundit & Pundette

You May Also Like

Government Two Sizes Too Big: White Coats in the White House

You’d need a thousand Sagans[1] to measure the enormity of the federal budget,…

Ron Paul Holds Three Irreconcilable Views on Abortion

Texas StateU.S. (I knew that!) Representative and probable presidential candidate, Ron Paul…

Six Entitlement Fixes to Steer Away From Fiscal Cliff

The Heritage Foundation suggests six entitlement reforms that should receive bipartisan support in order to steer us away from the fiscal cliff before us.

Iran’s “Ambassador of Death” and New Nuclear Capability

I’m sure the start-up of Iran’s nuclear reactor yesterday and then rolling…