Supreme Court Rules Religious Schools Can’t Be Excluded From School Choice Programs
The Supreme Court ruled that Montana’s exclusion of religious schools in their school choice program was a violation of its residents free exercise rights.
Vander Hart: Roberts Places Institutional Loyalty Before Sound Judgment
Shane Vander Hart: Chief Justice John Roberts had the opportunity to correct the wrong decision in Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt, but failed to do it.
Shane Vander Hart: In the Supreme Court’s majority opinion in Bostock, Justice Neil Gorsuch contradicted his own past remarks in 2016 and in Masterpiece.
(Video) Hawley on the Failure of the Conservative Legal Movement
Josh Hawley: “If this case makes anything clear, it is that the bargain that has been offered to religious conservatives for years now is a bad one. It’s time to reject it.’
Supreme Court Rules That Federal Employment Law Protects LGBT Persons
The Supreme Court ruled that federal employment anti-discrimination law does protect LGBT persons because of the prohibition against sex discrimination.
Grassley Calls on Schumer to Apologize to Gorsuch, Kavanaugh
Chuck Grassley: “At best, it was an injection of partisan politics into a process that should be immune to them. At worst, it was a threat targeting two sitting members of the Supreme Court.”
Roberts Rebukes Schumer for Threatening Justices During a Pro-Abortion Rally
Chief Justice John Roberts rebuked Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for threatening Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh at a pro-abortion rally.
The U.S. Supreme Court has taken up a pivotal case in the fight for school choice: Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue where tax credit scholarships are at stake.
Title VII was enacted, in part, to protect women in the workforce from discrimination, and does not include claims based on ‘sexual orientation” and “gender identity.”
Thomas on the Potential of Abortion for Eugenic Manipulation
Justice Clarence Thomas: “Given the potential for abortion to become a tool of eugenic manipulation, the Court will soon need to confront the constitutionality of laws like Indiana’s.”
