droneFirst we have the news that the National Security Agency (NSA) has been collecting data from Americanā€™s phone calls and gathering data on the internet.Ā  Now we learn that the FBI owns and has used drones for domestic surveillance.

Robert Mueller, the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, confirmed to lawmakers that the FBI owns several unmanned aerial vehicles, but has not adopted any strict policies or guidelines yet to govern the use of the controversial aircraft.

ā€œDoes the FBI use drones for surveillance on US soil?ā€ Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) asked Mr Mueller during an oversight hearing on Capitol Hill Wednesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

ā€œYes,ā€ Mueller responded bluntly, adding that the FBIā€™s operation of drones is ā€œvery seldom.ā€ (emphasis mine)

Mueller was later asked if heā€™d be open to transparency of the program.Ā  He replied, ā€œThere is a price to be paid for that transparency.Ā  I certainly think it would be educating our adversaries as to what our capabilities are.ā€

I can see the contracting with an agency who does have the drones legitimately, like the Border Patrol for instance, when there is the need to do a search on federal land with lots of square mileage of wilderness.Ā  Other than that Iā€™m not comfortable with the idea of them owning and using them for domestic surveillance; especially since no ā€œstrict policies or guidelinesā€Ā  have been established.

But hey, whatā€™s a little surveillance among friends, right?

Photo credit: Jim Sher via Flickr (CC By 2.0)

You May Also Like

And Santorum Rested…

David Brody at CBN notedĀ Rick Santorum’s decision to take 4 days off…

Debbie Wasserman Schultz is Out as DNC Chair

Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL) has announced that she will resign as the DNC chair after their convention in Philadelphia this week.

Thank You President Bush

I didn’t get a chance to watch President Bush’s farewell address live,…

Pro-Life Groups Support California’s Crisis Pregnancy Centers Before SCOTUS

Four pro-life groups support crisis pregnancy centers forced by the California Reproductive FACT Act to advertise and refer clients for abortion in NIFLA v. Becerra that the Supreme Court will hear in February.